Uno Platform
core
Our great sponsors
Uno Platform | core | |
---|---|---|
130 | 106 | |
8,349 | 20,535 | |
1.1% | 0.5% | |
10.0 | 9.2 | |
3 days ago | 6 days ago | |
C# | PowerShell | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Uno Platform
-
AvaloniaUI: Create Multi-Platform Apps with .NET
And Uno Platform (https://platform.uno/) is akin to React Native in terms of native controls usage.
-
Ask HN: Cross-platform GUI apps in 2024
also UNO Platform (C#) which is suitable for simple or complex cross platform business applications : https://platform.uno/
-
Lee's opinions on Umbraco + naming things
Why is this a problem? At face value, it isn't a problem. Taking a step back at a more global level, what does "uComponents" mean to the rest of the world? Many of the .NET developers who heavily use NuGet may have not even heard of Umbraco CMS, let alone a 3rd party plugin for it. What if people from the Uno Platform community are browsing NuGet for some kind of components extension library? You can see, this could get confusing outside the scope of the Umbraco community/ecosystem. On top of this, uComponents was developed against Umbraco v4, with its last release in 2016, now it's there to be lingering on the NuGet repository until the end of time, set in stone.
-
A Proposal for an asynchronous Rust GUI framework
[2]: https://platform.uno/
-
Dart 3.1 and a retrospective on functional style programming in Dart
Not a fan of XAML after trying to get into it, but there is Uno Platform. It wraps native widgets on mobile, just like React Native (which is good for accessibility), and uses C#. https://platform.uno/
My guess is that it's mainly focused on mobile. On Windows, it has no overhead (behaving like a normal WinUI 3 app), on macOS I think it uses Catalyst by default (which was developed by Apple to make more iOS apps available for Mac desktops) and on Linux it draws its own widgets that the devs try imitating the GTK style with.
On Android and iOS, it just uses the native widgets which I think is a better experience so you can see my reasons for guessing it's mobile-first. That may or may not be what you want.
-
What is the best for Develop Cross-platform Application ?
5- Uno
- Do you guys think this programmer is right about dotnet?
-
Cross-platform desktop applications
Also, .NET 7 brought a lot of stability so I am confident you'll have a better experience. I hope to hear back from you. It would be great to have any feedback at our repo - https://github.com/unoplatform/uno/discussions
-
Media Player Element now available for cross-platform apps everywhere dotnet runs
Announcement at our blogs , follow our GitHub here, and send us any feedback at discussions please.
core
-
.NET Monthly Roundup - March 2024 - .NET 9 Preview 2, Smart Components, AI fun, and more!
🌟.NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET 9 Preview 2 Discussion ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 Release Notes ➡️EF Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET Aspire preview 4 - .NET Aspire
-
Locally test and validate your Renovate configuration files
DEBUG: packageFiles with updates (repository=local) "config": { "nuget": [ { "deps": [ { "datasource": "nuget", "depType": "nuget", "depName": "Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting", "currentValue": "7.0.0", "updates": [ { "bucket": "non-major", "newVersion": "7.0.1", "newValue": "7.0.1", "releaseTimestamp": "2023-02-14T13:21:52.713Z", "newMajor": 7, "newMinor": 0, "updateType": "patch", "branchName": "renovate/dotnet-monorepo" }, { "bucket": "major", "newVersion": "8.0.0", "newValue": "8.0.0", "releaseTimestamp": "2023-11-14T13:23:17.653Z", "newMajor": 8, "newMinor": 0, "updateType": "major", "branchName": "renovate/major-dotnet-monorepo" } ], "packageName": "Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting", "versioning": "nuget", "warnings": [], "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/dotnet/runtime", "registryUrl": "https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json", "homepage": "https://dot.net/", "currentVersion": "7.0.0", "isSingleVersion": true, "fixedVersion": "7.0.0" } ], "packageFile": "RenovateDemo.csproj" } ] }
-
Why isn’t dotnet core popular among startups?
The tooling is not entirely open or freely available.
If you, for e.g., want to debug you have to use MS tooling.[0] You also can't use VSCodium because only the MS built/distributed version of VSCode contains the necessary proprietary binary blobs necessary to debug C# (which also means you're forced to using the aggressive telemetry and other data collection built into the non-open source distribution of VSCode).
They've also taken steps to lock down the LSP support for C#, which once again requires that you use a MS sanctioned code editor to write C#. [1]
I really enjoy writing C# and think dotnet is a great platform to develop for, but the barriers preventing me from building more projects on it is that I don't want to be forced to use VSCode or Visual Studio.
-
//////. How can you use the finder outer to recover lost crypto? ///
Thanks to .Net core
- Announcing BitcoinCashClient - A NuGet library for easy integration of BCH into any C# .NET application
-
API diff between .NET 7.0 and .NET 8 Preview 1
Similarly, here is the API diff between .NET 8.0 Preview 1 and .NET 8 Preview 2
-
Do I need to upgrade winforms porject to .NET 6?
Also .NET 7 dropped support for client Windows OSes older than Windows 10 v1607 ( ref: https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/main/release-notes/7.0/supported-os.md ) so if Windows 7 support is needed, the newest they could go is .NET 6.0 but that mandates SP1 w/ ESU.
If you go that route, it's completely useless to support both. Just support the latest, it will work for everyone. Win7 support will be dropped in net7 so you are still good with net6. But you never said win7 support is required either, I think in this day and age it's acceptable to drop it. If what worries you is having to install the net6 runtimes dependencies, just bundle them with your app as self contained.
-
snake_case & kebab-case JSON property name conversions added in System.Text.Json in .NET 8.
You can read what's coming in this case https://github.com/dotnet/core/issues/8133
What are some alternatives?
Avalonia - Develop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The most popular .NET Foundation community project.
Introducing .NET Multi-platform App UI (MAUI) - .NET MAUI is the .NET Multi-platform App UI, a framework for building native device applications spanning mobile, tablet, and desktop.
Flutter - Flutter makes it easy and fast to build beautiful apps for mobile and beyond
MudBlazor - Blazor Component Library based on Material design with an emphasis on ease of use. Mainly written in C# with Javascript kept to a bare minimum it empowers .NET developers to easily debug it if needed.
Mono - Mono open source ECMA CLI, C# and .NET implementation.
Electron.NET - :electron: Build cross platform desktop apps with ASP.NET Core (Razor Pages, MVC, Blazor).
WPF - WPF is a .NET Core UI framework for building Windows desktop applications.
react-native-windows - A framework for building native Windows apps with React.
ABP - Open Source Web Application Framework for ASP.NET Core. Offers an opinionated architecture to build enterprise software solutions with best practices on top of the .NET and the ASP.NET Core platforms. Provides the fundamental infrastructure, production-ready startup templates, application modules, UI themes, tooling, guides and documentation.
maui-linux - .NET MAUI is the .NET Multi-platform App UI, a framework for building native device applications spanning mobile, tablet, and desktop.
homebridge - HomeKit support for the impatient.
ASP.NET Boilerplate - ASP.NET Boilerplate - Web Application Framework