uPlot VS crystal

Here is a very efficient 2D canvas lib that is extremely efficient https://github.com/leeoniya/uPlot i recommend looking through their readme and seeing if it solves your current problems.

BACKEND:

It's about 3000 lines of Crystal code https://crystal-lang.org/ -- it's been an absolute dream to program in. Ruby-like syntax, statically compiled performance. Nice standard library. Would recommend :)

Performance == caching

Local ephemeral filesystem for shortest-term caching.

Redis for shared medium-term caching and locking.

S3-compatible object storage for longest-term caching (for raw data feeds pulled every evening by a cronjob).

FRONTEND:

Bootstrap

uPlot https://github.com/leeoniya/uPlot

Just a sprinkle of inline JS+CSS on the page.

you can use matchMedia to detect devicePixelRatio changes and re-sync:

https://github.com/leeoniya/uPlot/blob/190134aa844cfa2a0c052...

everything stays crisp even as you browser-zoom. e.g. https://leeoniya.github.io/uPlot/demos/area-fill.html

Safari's slow release cadence (typically tied to OS version upgrades) does leave it more broken and for longer than Firefox, Chrome, Opera and other browsers that are updated more frequently and not tied to the OS.

just recently i ran into incompatibilities with Safari < 14 needing the old-spec matchmedia api:

https://github.com/leeoniya/uPlot/issues/538#issuecomment-87...

uPlot will handle this. https://github.com/leeoniya/uPlot

If you are showing 100s of thousands of points, I'd still go with canvas eg uPlot. It's a really, really excellent library.

The existing node red chart tools is not great. I'd like to be able to use uplot instead. The uplot-charts node should work very much like that charts node built into node-red-dashboard.

super cool!

i've done my share of optimizations and benchmarking charting libs [1] but this goes deeper still.

SVG is not a good choice for large raw datasets when you need performance.

[1] https://github.com/leeoniya/uPlot#performance

27. Crystal - $77,104

I like the first code example on https://crystal-lang.org

    # A very basic HTTP server

Obviously as an interpreted language, it's never going to be as fast as something like C, Rust, or Go. Traditionally the ruby maintainers have not designed or optimized for pure speed, but that is changing, and the language is definitely faster these days compared to a decade ago.

If you like the ruby syntax/language but want the speed of a compiled language, it's also worth checking out Crystal[^1]. It's mostly ruby-like in syntax, style, and developer ergonomics.[^2] Although it's an entirely different language. Also a tiny community.

[1]: https://crystal-lang.org/

Crystal is a nice language that's not only simple to read and write but performs very well too. And the documentation is amazing as well.

Ruby is a super fun scripting language. I much prefer it to python when I need something with a little more "ooomph" than bash. It's just...nice...to write in. Ruby performance has come a long way in the last decade as well. There's libraries for pretty much everything.

My modern programming toolkit is basically golang + ruby + bash and I am never left wanting.

I do find Crystal (https://crystal-lang.org/) really interesting and am hoping it has its own "ruby on rails" moment that helps the language reach a tipping point in popularity. All the beauty of ruby with all of the speed of Go (and then some, it often compares favorably to languages like rust in benchmarks).