Typesense
quickwit
Our great sponsors
Typesense | quickwit | |
---|---|---|
129 | 64 | |
17,876 | 6,052 | |
4.4% | 9.6% | |
9.8 | 9.8 | |
6 days ago | 6 days ago | |
C++ | Rust | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Typesense
-
Website Search Hurts My Feelings
There are actually plenty of non-ES products that are way easier to integrate and tune (and get better results with less effort).
- Typesense (https://github.com/typesense/typesense)
- Algolia
- Google Programmable Search Engine (https://programmablesearchengine.google.com/about/)
- Remote Machine Learning and Searching on a Raspberry Pi 5
-
Open Source alternatives to tools you Pay for
Typesense - Open Source Alternative to Algolia
-
DNS record "hn.algolia.com" is gone
If you like your penny take a look at Typesense https://typesense.org/ - nothing to complain here. Especially nothing complain about pricing.
-
Vector databases: analyzing the trade-offs
I work on Typesense [1] (historically considered an open source alternative to Algolia).
We then launched vector search in Jan 2023, and just last week we launched the ability to generate embeddings from within Typesense.
You'd just need to send JSON data, and Typesense can generate embeddings for your data using OpenAI, PaLM API, or built-in models like S-BERT, E-5, etc (running on a GPU if you prefer) [2]
You can then do a hybrid (keyword + semantic) search by just sending the search keywords to Typesense, and Typesense will automatically generate embeddings for you internally and return a ranked list of keyword results weaved with semantic results (using Rank Fusion).
You can also combine filtering, faceting, typo tolerance, etc - the things Typesense already had.
[1] https://github.com/typesense/typesense
[2] https://typesense.org/docs/0.25.0/api/vector-search.html
-
Creating an advanced search engine with PostgreSQL
For something small with a minimal footprint, I'd recommend Typesense. https://github.com/typesense/typesense
-
Obsidian Publish full text search
I haven’t used Publish, but I’d assume you could use something like https://typesense.org/ to index and search the vault.
-
DynamoDB search options
A cheaper option would be to use https://typesense.org. You can use DynamoDb streams to automatically load records. It has worked well for me.
-
[Guide] A Tour Through the Python Framework Galaxy: Discovering the Stars
Try tigris | typesense for faster search
-
Is it worth using Postgres' builtin full-text search or should I go straight to Elastic?
I’m also checking out Typesense as a possibility for replacing Elastic: https://typesense.org/
quickwit
- Show HN: Search on S3 Using AWS Lambda
-
Show HN: Quickwit – OSS Alternative to Elasticsearch, Splunk, Datadog
Hi folks, Quickwit cofounder here.
We started Quickwit 3 years ago with a POC, "Searching the web for under $1000/month" (see HN discussions [0]), with the goal of making a robust OSS alternative to Elasticsearch / Splunk / Datadog.
We have reached a significant milestone with our latest release (0.7) [1], as we have witnessed users of the nightly version of Quickwit deploy clusters with hundreds of nodes, ingest hundreds of terabytes of data daily, and enjoy considerable cost savings.
To give you a concrete example, one company is ingesting hundreds of terabytes of logs daily and migrating from Elasticsearch to Quickwit. They divided their compute costs by 5x and storage costs by 2x while increasing retention from 3 to 30 days. They also increased their durability, accuracy with exactly-once semantics thanks to the native Kafka support, and elasticity.
The 0.7 release also brings better integrations with the Observability ecosystem: improvements of the Elasticsearch-compatible API and better support of OpenTelemetry standards, Grafana, and Jaeger.
Of course, we still have a lot of work to be a fully-fledged observability engine, and we would love to get some feedback or suggestions.
To give you a glance at our 2024 roadmap, we planned to focus on Kibana/OpenDashboard integration, metrics support, and pipe-based query language.
[0] Searching the web for under $1000/month: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27074481
[1] Release blog post: https://quickwit.io/blog/quickwit-0.7
[2] Open Source Repo: https://github.com/quickwit-oss/quickwit
[3] Home Page: https://quickwit.io
- Show HN: Quickwit – OSS Alternative to Datadog, Elasticsearch
-
S3 Express Is All You Need
We tested S3 Express for our search engine quickwit[0] a couple of weeks ago.
While this was really satisfying on the performance side, we were a bit disappointed by the price, and I mostly agree with the article on this matter.
I can see some very specific use cases where the pricing should be OK but currently, I would say most of our users should just stay on the classic S3 and add some local SSD caching if they have a lot of requests.
[0] https://github.com/quickwit-oss/quickwit/
-
Show HN: Quickwit – Cost-Efficient OSS Search Engine for Observability
Hi HN, I’m one of the builders of Quickwit, a cloud-native OSS search engine for observability. As of 2023, we support logs and traces, metrics will come in 2024.
You know the pitch: while software like Datadog or Splunk are great, they often comes with hefty price tags. Our mission is to offer an affordable alternative. So we’ve built Quickwit, we’ve made it compatible with the observabilty ecosystem (OpenTelemetry, Jaeger, Grafana) and above all, we’ve made it cost-efficient / “easy” to scale (well it’s never easy to scale to petabytes..).
To give you a glance at the engine performance I made a benchmark on the GitHub Archive dataset, 23 TB of events, here are the main observations:
Indexing: costs $2 per ingested TB. With 4CPU, throughput is at 20MBs However, you'll observe > 30MB throughput on simpler datasets, like logs and traces.
Search: a typical query costs $0.0002 per TB (considering both CPU time and GET request costs). Using 8CPU, a simple query on 23TB is achieved in under a second.
Storage: on S3, it costs $8 per ingested TB per month on the GitHub Archive dataset. With logs and traces, you might see costs around $5/ingested TB due to a 2x better compression ratio.
I'm eager to get your thoughts on this!
Benchmark: https://quickwit.io/blog/benchmarking-quickwit-engine-on-an-...
Github repo: https://github.com/quickwit-oss/quickwit/
Website: https://quickwit.io/
- On S3, it costs $8 per ingested TB per month on the GitHub Archive dataset. With logs and traces, you might see costs around $4/ingested TB due to a 2x better compression ratio.
I'm eager to get your thoughts on this!
[0] Benchmark: https://quickwit.io/blog/benchmarking-quickwit-engine-on-an-...
- OSS Sub-second search and analytics engine on cloud storage
-
Ask HN: Who is hiring? (September 2023)
Quickwit (https://quickwit.io/) | Paris, France | Onsite and remote (based in Europe) | Full-time
The company is fully remote but we also have a small office in Paris. We prefer candidates based in Europe but can make exceptions for the right profiles.
- Senior Software Engineer 80-110k€ + 0.25-1% equity based on experience.
We’re looking for a senior software engineer to contribute to [Quickwit](https://github.com/quickwit-oss/quickwit), our open-source search and analytics engine. We have an ambitious roadmap for the next 18 months (performance optimization, distributed storage, support for SQL, query optimizer, revamp of our execution engine, etc.), and this is a great opportunity to shape the future of Quickwit while tackling fun and challenging problems in the field of distributed databases.
-
Observe your Rust application with Quickwit, Jaeger and Grafana
In our latest blog post, we walk you through the steps of instrumenting your Rust application and monitoring the performance on Grafana using Quickwit + Jaeger.
-
Quickwit 0.6.0 - Search and analytics on billions of logs with minimal hardware
Link: https://github.com/quickwit-oss/quickwit
What are some alternatives?
MeiliSearch - A lightning-fast search API that fits effortlessly into your apps, websites, and workflow
Elasticsearch - Free and Open, Distributed, RESTful Search Engine
loki - Like Prometheus, but for logs.
Apache Solr - Apache Lucene and Solr open-source search software
elasticsearch-py - Official Python client for Elasticsearch
meilisearch-laravel-scout - MeiliSearch integration for Laravel Scout
manticoresearch - Easy to use open source fast database for search | Good alternative to Elasticsearch now | Drop-in replacement for E in the ELK soon
openobserve - 🚀 10x easier, 🚀 140x lower storage cost, 🚀 high performance, 🚀 petabyte scale - Elasticsearch/Splunk/Datadog alternative for 🚀 (logs, metrics, traces, RUM, Error tracking, Session replay).
sonic - 🦔 Fast, lightweight & schema-less search backend. An alternative to Elasticsearch that runs on a few MBs of RAM.
zincsearch - ZincSearch . A lightweight alternative to elasticsearch that requires minimal resources, written in Go.