typebox
json5
Our great sponsors
typebox | json5 | |
---|---|---|
57 | 94 | |
4,227 | 6,278 | |
- | 1.1% | |
8.8 | 0.0 | |
4 days ago | 5 months ago | |
TypeScript | JavaScript | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
typebox
-
Popular Libraries For Building Type-safe Web Application APIs
The documentation can be found here.
-
I write HTTP services in Go after 13 years (Mat Ryer, 2024)
So far I like the commonly used approach in the Typescript community best:
1. Create your Schema using https://zod.dev or https://github.com/sinclairzx81/typebox
2. Generate your Types from the schema. It's very simple to create partial or composite types, e.g. UpdateModel, InsertModels, Arrays of them, etc.
3. Most modern Frameworks have first class support for validation, like is a great example Fastify (with typebox). Just reuse your schema definition.
That is very easy, obvious and effective.
- Where DRY Applies
-
Has anybody used Typia library?
There's a ton of schema validators out there and most devs have their personal favorite. Mine was zod and is now typebox + ajv.
- I'm looking to use my openapi spec to dyanamically create types
-
How can I generate typescript types?
If you're willing to document your API with an OpenAPI schema, then it should be possible to generate TypeScript types based on the OpenAPI schema with something like openapi-typescript. Also, Typebox can generate JSON schemas, maybe it can be used to generate something that the front-end can also use?
-
[AskTS] What do you think will be the future of runtime type checking?
Well, I do provide extensibility for those bullet points you've listed to varying degrees (both schema and type representation), as well as offering a reference implementation for expressing a entirely different schema specification under the type system (specifically RFC8927 / JSON Type Definition). Reference implementation here. As for JSDoc, It's supported in code hints.
- TypeBox: Runtime Type System Built on Industry Standards
- TypeBox: A Type System for JavaScript built on Industry Standard Specifications
-
Building a modern gRPC-powered microservice using Node.js, Typescript, and Connect
In setting out to build this service, we wanted to use gRPC for its APIs. We’ve been reaching for REST when building APIs so far, primarily out of necessity, i.e., our public APIs needed auto-generated client SDKs and docs for developers working with them. We built those APIs with Fastify and Typebox but felt burned by a code-first approach to generating an OpenAPI spec. I’ll spare you the details and save that experience/learning for another article. Suffice it to say we love gRPC’s schema-first approach. This blog post summarizes our feelings well
json5
- JSON5 – JSON for Humans
- Why the fuck are we templating YAML? (2019)
-
I pre-released my project "json-responder" written in Rust
JSON5 support
-
topoconfig: enhancing config declarations with graphs
Meanwhile, formats have been evolving (JSON5, YAML), config entry points are constantly changing. These fluctuations, fortunately, were covered by tools like the cosmiconfig.
-
That's a Lot of YAML
I think JSON5 is fairly close to this: https://json5.org
I reckon the only thing it's missing to be truly accessible to non-techies is that string values still need to be quoted, i.e. you can't have:
key: this is my value
(I'm definitely not saying it would be a good idea to allow quotes to be dropped, just that that's the only potential stumbling block I see for non-techies.)
-
XML is better than YAML
I believe that's JSON5.
https://github.com/json5/json5
It's my preferred configuration file format, it fixes all the problems I have with JSON (trailing commas, comments) without turning it into a mess full of gotchas like YAML.
- Fx – Terminal JSON Viewer
- What Is Wrong with TOML?
-
🚀 'GET' API in API Maker
JSON 5 support
-
TySON: a native go library that lets you use TypeScript as an embedded configuration language without depending on Node or V8
I would like to see mention of JSON5 which is 11 years its elder. For comments in JSON, JSON5 is a good starting point.
What are some alternatives?
zod - TypeScript-first schema validation with static type inference
Json.NET - Json.NET is a popular high-performance JSON framework for .NET
zod-to-json-schema - Converts Zod schemas to Json schemas
hjson-js - Hjson for JavaScript
ajv - The fastest JSON schema Validator. Supports JSON Schema draft-04/06/07/2019-09/2020-12 and JSON Type Definition (RFC8927)
jq - Command-line JSON processor [Moved to: https://github.com/jqlang/jq]
class-validator - Decorator-based property validation for classes.
toml - Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language
openapi-typescript-validator - Generate typescript with ajv validation based on openapi schemas
jsonnet - Jsonnet - The data templating language
ts-json-schema-generator - Generate JSON schema from your Typescript sources
sublime-hjson - Hjson support for Sublime Text