Travis CI.com VS Tailwind CSS

Travis CI: This hosted CI/CD service can seamlessly integrate with code hosting platforms like GitHub.

TRAVIS: With the help of Travis CI, you can easily synchronize your GITHUB projects. Travis offers more language support than circleCI and also you can run test on linux and mac OS at the same time. For more info: https://travis-ci.org/

Automation is a critical tool for improving DevOps efficiency. Many cloud platforms offer enhanced automation solutions for DevOps activities, such as CI/CD. CircleCI, Jenkins, GitLab, and Travis CI are all examples of such tools used for continuous integration. These technologies provide uniformity and speed while requiring minimal human intervention.

And finally, the engineers need to be able to easily deploy to Kubernetes, which can either be done with the same tools or with specialized CI/CD tools, such as Jenkins, Circle CI, or Travis CI.

To deploy an application to production, more complex continuous integration and deployment solutions exist. Since Kubernetes is so common now that almost all CI/CD tools support it, it does not really matter if these solutions are particularly specialized on Kubernetes or not. You should rather compare different solutions again and see which best fits your needs. A good starting point are these tools: Jenkins, Codefresh, Travis CI, and Circle CI.

And it became quite a good conversation like, well, I wish that it would also update my GitHub Actions tree because of my Travis CI tree because I wish it did this, I wish it did that. I think the biggest users were the WG, the browser rendering engine people. They had some requirements they couldn't use until they were fixed. So we had a really good conversation there. But yeah, tech is never the hard part; it's always the people.

This tool is written in Golang and still used travis-ci as CI. Furthermore, some parts of the release process were still manually, such as uploading the assets to a GitHub release and generating the release notes. We wanted to have this automated.

You should use a service like Travis CI. Much easier than the route you are taking.

https://fastlane.tools https://danger.systems https://www.sonarqube.org https://codemagic.io/ https://travis-ci.org

Datree has really good integration with CicleCi, TravisCi, GitHub Actions, GitLab also.

Tailwind CSS

With better CSS approaches like TailwindCSS and Vanilla Extract (which we're heavily using) it's much easier to maintain the UI and make sure it doesn't change unexpectedly. No more conflicting CSS classes, much less CSS specificity issues and much less CSS code in general.

This app was built with Svelte Kit, Tailwind CSS, and many other technologies. For a full rundown, please visit the GitHub repository

Unlike Tailwind, which has over 77,000 stars on GitHub, Mojo CSS has about 200 stars on GitHub. But the Mojo CSS documentation is fairly good and you can find most of the information you’ll need there.

JavaScript React Flowbite Tailwind Firebase - Auth, Database, and Hosting Vite

- Performance is a feature.

Another common interpretation of brutalism is aesthetic, reacting to overly complicated user interfaces by creating simpler, more direct ones. Tailwind CSS (https://tailwindcss.com), one of today's most popular CSS libraries, promotes this approach in its component examples. There's also a neat library I've seen recently called "Neobrutalism Components" for React that I like (https://neobrutalism-components.vercel.app), providing components with a similar look and feel to Gumroad. This might more accurately be called 'Neo-Brutalism,' as noted in the comments.

A more engineering-centric interpretation of Brutalism focuses on form, structure, and efficiency, drawing significantly from brutalist architecture principles. Apart from the user interface itself, most mobile, desktop, and web applications are extremely bloated and often perform worse than sites from 10 years ago did. While one HTML file might be "less brutalist" than the original HN site, it is substantially more brutalist than any HN mobile app in existence, and offers nearly identical functionality.

A broader interpretation of brutalism, which could be termed 'Meta-Brutalism,' is embodied in the overall experience on this site through UX flows. Yes, in the strictest sense, the original HN site is more Brutalist in many ways, but it only shows 30 articles at a time and does not function as a PWA. For this site, the experience of reading 10 stories is arguably less brutalist, but for quickly browsing through several pages and skimming articles (which is how I read HN) it is a lot faster, and in my opinion, more Brutalist.

My primary inspiration was addressing software and tool bloat in UIs rather than strictly adhering to every principle set forth by David Bryant Copeland. I don't find it convincing that this site "isn't brutalist" compared to really any other experience apart from the Main HN site, and I would argue the overall experience is more brutalist in its performance and scrolling behavior.

As a side note: I generally don't like Brutalist architecture that much although I believe it is unfairly maligned. I visited the Salk Institute once and enjoyed it though (https://www.archdaily.com/61288/ad-classics-salk-institute-l...).

- Staff Software Engineer ($275k/yr): https://tailwindcss.com/careers/staff-software-engineer

We're small, independent, and profitable, with a team of just 6 people doing millions in revenue, and growing sustainably every year. You'd work directly with the founders on open-source software used by millions of people.

If you like the idea of working on a small team that cares about craft and isn't trying to achieve VC scale, I think this is a pretty awesome place to do your best work.

Instead of Booststrap, I used Tailwind CSS as the CSS library.

Tailwind CSS: A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom designs.

Basic knowledge of Tailwind CSS and MobX-State-Tree