transient VS arrowapply-utils

Compare transient vs arrowapply-utils and see what are their differences.

transient

A full stack, reactive architecture for general purpose programming. Algebraic and monadically composable primitives for concurrency, parallelism, event handling, transactions, multithreading, Web, and distributed computing with complete de-inversion of control (No callbacks, no blocking, pure state) (by transient-haskell)
Control Transient Distributed Computing Web Events Threading Composition Backtracking Composability Haskell Transaction Concurrency
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

arrowapply-utils

A test implementation of draft versions of CellML 1.2 (by A1kmm)
Control
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
WorkOS
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
transient arrowapply-utils
- -
629 4
0.3% -
0.0 0.0
about 3 years ago over 11 years ago
Haskell Haskell
MIT License BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

transient

Posts with mentions or reviews of transient. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning transient yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

arrowapply-utils

Posts with mentions or reviews of arrowapply-utils. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning arrowapply-utils yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing transient and arrowapply-utils you can also consider the following projects:

failure - A simple type class for success/failure computations.

free - free monads

selective - Selective Applicative Functors: Declare Your Effects Statically, Select Which to Execute Dynamically

safe-exceptions - Safe, consistent, and easy exception handling

can-i-haz - Generic implementation of the Has pattern for MonadReader/MonadState and CoHas for MonadError

foldl - Composable, streaming, and efficient left folds

imm - Execute arbitrary actions for each unread element of RSS/Atom feeds

pipes - Compositional pipelines

transient-universe - A Cloud monad based on transient for the creation of Web and reactive distributed applications that are fully composable, where Web browsers are first class nodes in the cloud

funflow - Functional workflows

hask - Category theory for Haskell with a lens flavor (you need GHC 7.8.3, not 7.8.2 to build this!)

capability - Extensional capabilities and deriving combinators

transient vs failure arrowapply-utils vs free transient vs selective arrowapply-utils vs safe-exceptions transient vs can-i-haz arrowapply-utils vs foldl transient vs imm arrowapply-utils vs pipes transient vs transient-universe arrowapply-utils vs funflow transient vs hask arrowapply-utils vs capability