Trac VS Gitlab CI

For instance, when I enter Trac-2345, logseq knows that it must be replaced by a link to the ticket number 2345 in my Trac ticket system.

Before there was Github, I used this software called Trac since it worked with subversion. It was so cool to be able to view source code and commits on the web. Then around 2007 or so I started using git and then in 2009 I created a Github account...so proud of Github and Rails. Thanks for the writeup!

If you want more functionality, such as a ticketing system and the ability to manage source code repos, look at Redmine (https://www.redmine.org/) which also has a wiki feature. Trac is older but also has a wiki (https://trac.edgewall.org/).

Trac. https://github.com/edgewall/trac

For my documentation : Trac

Try Trac, I've used it before without issues.

AFAIK Redmine is a project management software that mostly used in software development. If it is what you looking for, then check also track

The sound of it from the article reminds me some of https://trac.edgewall.org/

Trac - SQL based (literally in the GUI) issue tracker & documentation, not bad, not for me

## https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/issues/694

// https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/blob/e6d048d769240760008f0dbb6b811e1ebc675292/app/assets/javascripts/ide/components/repo_tab.vue#L3 import { GlIcon, GlTab } from '@gitlab/ui'; import { mapActions, mapGetters } from 'vuex'; import { __, sprintf } from '~/locale'; import ChangedFileIcon from '~/vue_shared/components/changed_file_icon.vue'; import FileIcon from '~/vue_shared/components/file_icon.vue'; import FileStatusIcon from './repo_file_status_icon.vue'; export default { components: { FileStatusIcon, FileIcon, GlIcon, ChangedFileIcon, GlTab, }, props: { tab: { type: Object, required: true, }, }, data() { return { tabMouseOver: false, }; }, computed: { ...mapGetters(['getUrlForPath']), closeLabel() { if (this.fileHasChanged) { return sprintf(__('%{tabname} changed'), { tabname: this.tab.name }); } return sprintf(__('Close %{tabname}'), { tabname: this.tab.name }); }, showChangedIcon() { if (this.tab.pending) return true; return this.fileHasChanged ? !this.tabMouseOver : false; }, fileHasChanged() { return this.tab.changed || this.tab.tempFile || this.tab.staged || this.tab.deleted; }, }, methods: { ...mapActions(['closeFile', 'updateDelayViewerUpdated', 'openPendingTab']), clickFile(tab) { if (tab.active) return; this.updateDelayViewerUpdated(true); if (tab.pending) { this.openPendingTab({ file: tab, keyPrefix: tab.staged ? 'staged' : 'unstaged' }); } else { this.$router.push(this.getUrlForPath(tab.path)); } }, mouseOverTab() { if (this.fileHasChanged) { this.tabMouseOver = true; } }, mouseOutTab() { if (this.fileHasChanged) { this.tabMouseOver = false; } }, }, };

In setting this up, I have followed the gitlab setup guide and the passenger documentation.

Do you know G2 awards 4.4 stars to both GitLab & CircleCI? Just like GitHub stars, StackShares stack counts reflect the popularity of technology. CircleCI boasts around 7.4k stacks, while GitLab enjoys 31.1k stacks. Besides, GitLab as well as GitLab CI are open-source technologies and have garnered 22k+ stars on GitHub. Wait, this is not a reflection of how good GitLab is at CI/CD. These numbers reflect overall popularity. CircleCI is primarily “a niche-focused continuous integration tool” while GitLab wears multiple hats, including “version control & code collaborator.”