tig VS cz-cli

> I would really like it if Magit was a standalone program, rather than an Emacs package, so that I could just switch to a more reasonable editor.

Always curious with folks who request this whether they've tried `tig` (https://jonas.github.io/tig/)?

Not sure what part of Magit you're looking for, but the basic workflow of jumping to changes and interactive staging works just as well to me in `tig` (with Vim) as Magit.

Use tig. This TUI (terminal user interface) is halfway between the GUI and the command line. It basically does the same thing as the previous command, but it’s easier on the eyes while allowing you to stay in the terminal. It will also make it easier to see the diff for a particular commit.

If you want an interactive commit graph, among other features, look at tig https://jonas.github.io/tig/

https://github.com/jonas/tig is one of the first things I install on a new dev machine. It's a really nice UI for staging files or hunks. Since it's just a companion to the git CLI, it feels much more focused than full-blown git GUIs, and doesn't do anything magical.

Related but I use tig, a TUI, a lot to examine the state of my working tree and index and stage/unstage/reset changes piecemeal. It works great.

I'd like to plug [tig](https://github.com/jonas/tig) for those who don't use emacs. I see lazygit recommended here too, but I've been using tig for years now and love it's simplicity.

Try tig

I'm normally a CLI git (and tig) user.

We also can use tools like Commitizen Commitizen, and commitlint to enforce valid and consistent commit messages.

There are several tools available to make easier to commit following the Angular convention, like Commitizen, that opens an interactive shell on every commit, guiding you to react the best commit message possible for that change.

Adopt a convention like commitizen: https://github.com/commitizen/cz-cli

'typeofchange(scopeofchange): reason for change'

It sort helps force devs to type out more meaningful commit messages.

Commitizen Define a interface to write your commits and automatically and a prefix and a suffix to your message. (and others features not related)

Conventional commits are great, especially if you add in commit linting.

Being able to programmatically increment semantic versions and automatically generate relevant changelogs is awesome.

It’s also nice to implement Commitizen[0] for a little hand holding until folks get used to the linting.

I used to care a lot about doing things the way that felt right to me, but now I just want some common standard that is easy for everyone to follow, easy to automate, and easy to verify programmatically.

Things like conventional commits and semantic versioning aren’t perfect, but they are quite good and apply broadly to many use cases with common tooling and conventions.

--

[0]: http://commitizen.github.io/cz-cli/

In the world of software development, maintaining consistent code quality and ensuring that the codebase adheres to predefined patterns and guidelines is crucial. However, manually enforcing these standards can be time-consuming and error-prone. This is where automation tools like Husky, Lint-Staged, Commitlint, and Commitizen come to the rescue. In this post, we will explore how these tools can be combined to streamline your development workflow.

Conventional commits specification contains a set of rules for creating an explicit commit history, which makes it easier to write automated tools on top of, for example, semantic release. You can manually follow this convention in your project or use a tool to assist you, such as Commitizen.

When working with JavaScript projects, managing version numbers and commit messages is important for the maintainability of the project. Since 2020 I have been the main developer of Atomic Calendar Revive a highly customisable Home Assistant calendar card, I found maintaining versions and releases to be cumbersome until recently. In this article, I will introduce the commitizen and semantic-release packages for creation or appropriate commit messages and semantic versioning. I will also provide examples of how I am currently using these packages to streamline my release workflow and project maintenance.

I use Commitizen to enforce a strict commit message. It's not required - but it makes my life easier. It adheres to a standard - but it's certainly not "the" standard.