testcontainers-scala VS µTest

Compare testcontainers-scala vs µTest and see what are their differences.

testcontainers-scala

Docker containers for testing in scala (by testcontainers)

µTest

A simple testing framework for Scala (by lihaoyi)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
testcontainers-scala µTest
2 2
613 478
1.3% -0.6%
7.4 4.2
about 1 month ago 3 days ago
Scala Scala
MIT License -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

testcontainers-scala

Posts with mentions or reviews of testcontainers-scala. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-31.

µTest

Posts with mentions or reviews of µTest. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-02-11.
  • From First Principles: Why Scala?
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 11 Feb 2021
    Let's clarify some points for folks not so familiar with Scala.

    > * Scala minor version are binary incompatible, so maintaining Scala projects is a big pain. Upgrading Spark from Scala 2.11 to Scala 2.12 was a massive undertaking for example.

    Scala just chose a strange naming scheme. Other languages would have just increased their major version instead. The scala minor version is increased every few years and not every month or so.

    > * Scala has tons of language features and lets people do crazy things in the code.

    Actually, that's not true. Or rather: compared to what language?

    Scala has surprisingly few language features, but the ones it has are very flexible and powerful. Take Kotlin for example. It has method extensions as a dedicated feature. Scala just has implicits which can be used for method extension.

    > * Scalatest is stil used by most projects and is annoying to use, as described here: https://github.com/lihaoyi/utest#why-utest. The overuse of DSLs in Scala is really annoying.

    I agree with the overuse of DSLs. Luckily that got much better, but older libraries like scalatest still suffer from that.

    > * Li's libs (os-lib, upickle, utest) have clean public interfaces, but most Scala ecosystem libs are hard to use, see the JSON alternatives for examples

    I think that just comes from using the library in a non-idiomatic way. In most applications, you will need to use the whole json anyways, and then you use (or can use) circe like that:

        {

What are some alternatives?

When comparing testcontainers-scala and µTest you can also consider the following projects:

ScalaTest - A testing tool for Scala and Java developers

ScalaMock - Native Scala mocking framework

zio-kafka - A Kafka client for ZIO and ZIO Streams

Diffy

Specs2 - Software Specifications for Scala

scalaprops - property based testing library for Scala

cornichon - Testing tool in Scala for HTTP JSON API

Scala Test-State - Scala Test-State.

Gatling - Modern Load Testing as Code

Mockito Scala - Mockito for Scala language

Scalive - Connect a Scala REPL to running JVM processes without any prior setup