Scala Test-State
µTest
Our great sponsors
Scala Test-State | µTest | |
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
138 | 478 | |
- | -0.6% | |
1.7 | 4.2 | |
4 days ago | 2 days ago | |
Scala | Scala | |
Apache License 2.0 | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Scala Test-State
-
What's the maturity level of ScalaJS?
It actually been rock-solid for many, many years now! I've built quite a few things with it and introduced it to teams who picked it up very quickly and with no major problems. I've never had any production problems with it EVER and I've been living and breathing it pretty much every day for ages now. It's very, very unit testable (oh! check out Scala Test State if you're interested in really powerful and concise Scala.JS testing) so it's nearly trivial to have to very well tested webapp, including mouse clicks, key presses, whatever you want. Awesome awesome stuff and the Scala.JS team deserve some kind of tech Nobel prize imo. It's been a game changer for me.
µTest
-
From First Principles: Why Scala?
Let's clarify some points for folks not so familiar with Scala.
> * Scala minor version are binary incompatible, so maintaining Scala projects is a big pain. Upgrading Spark from Scala 2.11 to Scala 2.12 was a massive undertaking for example.
Scala just chose a strange naming scheme. Other languages would have just increased their major version instead. The scala minor version is increased every few years and not every month or so.
> * Scala has tons of language features and lets people do crazy things in the code.
Actually, that's not true. Or rather: compared to what language?
Scala has surprisingly few language features, but the ones it has are very flexible and powerful. Take Kotlin for example. It has method extensions as a dedicated feature. Scala just has implicits which can be used for method extension.
> * Scalatest is stil used by most projects and is annoying to use, as described here: https://github.com/lihaoyi/utest#why-utest. The overuse of DSLs in Scala is really annoying.
I agree with the overuse of DSLs. Luckily that got much better, but older libraries like scalatest still suffer from that.
> * Li's libs (os-lib, upickle, utest) have clean public interfaces, but most Scala ecosystem libs are hard to use, see the JSON alternatives for examples
I think that just comes from using the library in a non-idiomatic way. In most applications, you will need to use the whole json anyways, and then you use (or can use) circe like that:
{
What are some alternatives?
Gatling - Modern Load Testing as Code
ScalaMock - Native Scala mocking framework
ScalaMeter - Microbenchmarking and performance regression testing framework for the JVM platform.
Diffy
cornichon - Testing tool in Scala for HTTP JSON API
scalaprops - property based testing library for Scala
ScalaCheck - Property-based testing for Scala
ScalaTest - A testing tool for Scala and Java developers
Scalive - Connect a Scala REPL to running JVM processes without any prior setup