terraform-provider-docker VS crossplane

... and if you're an opinionated person, like me, and you value consolidated infrastructure atomicity as a whole along side locks for everything. You'd port cherry-picked helm charts as terraform modules with k2tf, and build every docker container from scratch, with forced layer invalidation to perform security updates for every image, using the docker and kubernetes providers respectively.

For the docker management, we are going to use terraform module kreuzwerker/docker. It provides us an opportunity to build and upload docker image to a docker repository.

Communication is crucial; that's why we want to keep it public, even if we receive private requests through other channels such as @gophers/terraform-provider-docker in Slack. We encourage engineers to open an issue or use the recently released discussions feature from GitHub. The code of conduct helped us set the etiquette guidelines, how we want to work together, and which tone and politeness we expect.

did anyone adopt in production https://crossplane.io ?

- https://github.com/crossplane/crossplane/blob/master/design/one-pager-composition-environment.md

In the overall scheme of things , look at services like backstage.io , crossplane.io and opslevel.com to get ideas. This is not necessarily an endorsement of the services. If all you want is to handle cloud resources and that's it, Terraform can be enough with what ever flavor of web technologies you and your team are comfortable with and can support it along the way. Doesn't take much to create a js based website to collect data from a form, or use other means to collecting data as long as its recorded and transparent for accountability.

XRs are written in a fully declarative manner. And when I am building my XR from underlying managed resources provided by some crossplane provider I need to parametrize resources, use conditionals and create arrays of resuorces The issues of declarativeness in the world of automation are well known- we typically resort to some form of templating and we invent some imperative expressions into that templating language/format. This is currently not very well supported with Crossplane however Crossplane team realizes this issue and they are conteptualizing solution here

I have an idea for a project that would interface with Crossplane. The project has some code that would save tons of time if I could use it directly in my project, but it is located in the internal directory. I can't import the modules directly, but the project is open sourced under an Apache 2.0 license, so the code itself is available for use under that license.

There are always new projects like crossplane that sit on top on architecture systems like terraform, vagrant. The pressure to abstract away any sort of resources is mounting, companies can save a lot by for example by alt hosting S3 endpoints. The train is going the direction not to tie anything to a specific platform implementation if its not a must. Most of the companies I work with use AWS as a hosting provider, but Microsoft for github and related CI matters. As I learned, AWS quality is very dependent on location, eu-central-1 is dead stable for our use cases serving about millions requests a day.

Practically, you'll be replacing stock k8s resources (deployments) with custom ones like Argo Rollouts with Keda autoscaling, so you have to plan the respective Gitops CD pipeline (fluxcd/argocd with some crossplane), as well.