teletype-crdt VS samples

Cool! It'd be interesting to see those CRDT implementations added to Kevin Jahns' CRDT Benchmarks page[1]. The LogootSplit paper looks interesting. It looks like xray is abandoned, and I'm not sure about teletype. Though teletype's CRDT looks to be entirely implemented in javascript[2]? If the authors are around I'd love to see some benchmarks so we can compare approaches and learn what actually works well.

And I'm not surprised these techniques have been invented before. Realising a tree is an appropriate data structure here is a pretty obvious step if you have a mind for data structures.

To name it, I often find myself feeling defensive when people read my work and respond with a bunch of links to academic papers. Its probably totally unfair and a complete projection from my side, but I hear a voice in my head reword your comment to instead say something awful like: "Cool, but everything you did was done before. Even if they didn't make any of their work practical, usable or good they still published first and you obviously didn't do a good enough literature review if you didn't know that." And I feel an unfair defensiveness arise in me as a result that wants to find excuses to dismiss the work, even if the work might be otherwise interesting.

Its hard to compare their benchmark results because they used synthetic randomized editing traces, which always have different performance profiles than real edits for this stuff. Their own university gathered some great real world data in an earlier study. It would have been much more instructive if that data set was used here. At a glance their RAM usage looks to be about 2 orders of magnitude worse than diamond-types or yjs. And their CPU usage... ?? I can't tell because they have no tables of results. Just some hard to read charts with log scales, so you can't even really eyeball the figures. So its really hard to tell if their work ends up performance-competitive without spending a couple days getting their enterprise style java code running with a better data set. Do you think thats worth doing?

[1] https://github.com/dmonad/crdt-benchmarks

[2] https://github.com/atom/teletype-crdt

1) crdt

Element Embedding demo source code

Source: https://github.com/flutter/samples/tree/main/experimental/element_embedding_demo :)

For a complete overview of M3 in Flutter, check out the official Material 3 Demo.

I've tinkered around with the https://github.com/flutter/samples/tree/main/add_to_app/android_view repository. I deleted the content of the dart files and replaced it with just a scaffold and button that connects to my method channel. I wrote a simple plugin which extends FlutterPlugin and Activity Aware the handle the method channel. My main problem seems to be, that the GeneratedPluginRegistrant.java file does not contain any references to my Flutter plugin. pub get within the Flutter Module doesn't add my plugin.

Simple state management, aka pragmatic state management, is based on Provider+ChangeNotifier. It's well documented, and there's a code sample.

That "toolkit" is basically a pubspec.yaml with preconfigured dependencies not including a game engine and some sample code how to use Firebase, Admob, and some other google services.

So it's been 3 days, since I started understanding the new Navigator 2.0 thing, and belive they were worst 3 days I have ever had with flutter, anyways I took nearly all of the code from this official repo.

I can respond to (c.) - We just released a navigation sample app, which demonstrates some common navigation scenarios. We are also actively researching routing and navigation APIs and will share more on that soon.