tech.ml.dataset VS hanami

Tablecloth by generateme is a friendly & expressive table-processing library built on top of tech.ml.dataset & dtype-next, Chris Nuernberger's high-performance data libraries.

For 1: This ns of tech.ml.dataset supports reading of multiple worksheets per file https://github.com/techascent/tech.ml.dataset/blob/master/src/tech/v3/libs/fastexcel.clj

After building tech.ml.dataset and charred I wanted to take the lessons learned there and apply them back into the base Clojure substrate of persistent maps, persistent vectors, and algorithmic primitives like group-by and frequencies.

Did you try tech.ml.dataset?

Checkout babashka for scritping and clj-python to use numpy from clojure, or https://github.com/techascent/tech.ml.dataset for pure clojure

Really high quality libraries for deep learning, dataset manipulation, and more

tech.ml.dataset has seen some major upgrades for discoverability - specifically the tech.ml.dataset main namespace has been revamped. If you use Cursive or Calva your intellisense will now work with the main namespaces.

It is based on a state-of-the art , high performance tabular dataset implementation, tech.ml.dataset and combines it with a innovative pipeline approach build with idiomatic and functional Clojure concepts in mind. Machine Learning models get pulled in as plugins from existing ecosystems, so are available from the start. Please find user guides and example code in GitHub at https://github.com/scicloj/scicloj.ml

There are a few good charting options for Clojure in addition to OZ. Another interesting and more orthogonaly designed pathway if you want to go the vega/vega-lite route is Hanami and for a full scientific application platform it's big sibling saite.