tatum-js VS mythril

Tatum is a blockchain development platform that provides a suite of APIs, SDKs, and other tools to help developers build blockchain-based applications. It offers support for various blockchain networks, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, and more.

Nice, I see. Do any of the product offerings at https://tatum.io/ have any appeal to you? I'm aiming to better understand our product market fit with developers such as yourself and gather feedback. I don't really have any incentive at this time, so if you do find yourself curious enough to check it out and follow up with me I really appreciate your time in advance :)

Tatum offers a relatively simple way to interact with the blockchain without requiring developers to create new smart contracts and have any knowledge in Solidity or Truffle.

They use a third-party blockchain platform (https://tatum.io/) to deploy contracts and interact with them. So the contracts are handled from their end and they only send REST API calls to their service.

Hi there, you could use our estimate transaction fee endpoint in Tatum: https://tatum.io/apidoc.php#operation/EstimateFeeBlockchain

Hi, I work at Tatum, we created the NFT Maker plugin.

As far as batch creation, I work at Tatum, and we have an endpoint to mint multiple NFTs: https://tatum.io/apidoc.php#operation/NftMintMultipleErc721

I work for Tatum, and we have both C# and JavaScript SDKs that you can use to build apps on 40+ blockchain protocols.

Fuzzing has been around for a while in traditional full-stack development, but a new class of tools is here that can apply fuzzing to smart contract testing in web3. Some of the fuzzing tools include the open source Echidna and MythX.

Mythril is part of the core tools of Consensys Mythx one of the biggest Smart Contract security services for Ethereum, which main goal is to ensure development teams avoid costly errors and make Ethereum more secure and trustworthy… or at least that is what their page says.

Other than audits and testing, there's automated security checking: https://github.com/ConsenSys/mythril I'm yet to try this in one of my projects

Mythril

MythX, Mythril, Manticore, and Echidna are other tools for security audits.

Smart Contract Weakness Classification and Test Cases: https://swcregistry.io/ OKO Contract Explorer: https://oko.palkeo.com/txview Slither: https://github.com/crytic/slither MythX: https://mythx.io/ Tenderly: https://tenderly.dev/ Spot check program: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16...

There are some paid tools and some free ones. A few that come to mind are ConsenSys MythX (based in part on the open-source Mythril), ShiftLeft, Oyente, Octopus… maybe best to just check out ETHSecurity’s list.

When you say "formal verification methods", what kind of techniques are you interested in? While using interactive theorem provers will most likely not become very widespread, there are plenty of tools that use formal techniques to give more correctness guarantees. These tools might give some guarantees, but do not guarantee complete functional correctness. WireGuard (VPN tunnel) is I think a very interesting application where they verified the protocol. There are also some tools in use, e.g. Mythril and CrossHair, that focus on detecting bugs using symbolic execution. There's also INFER from Facebook/Meta which tries to verify memory safety automatically. The following GitHub repo might also interest you, it lists some companies that use formal methods: practical-fm

- Audited by MythX.io

ability to run security analysis on contracts using for .e.g. https://github.com/ConsenSys/mythril