tasty-groundhog-converters VS DocTest

Compare tasty-groundhog-converters vs DocTest and see what are their differences.


Testing Harness for groundhog and groundhog converters. (by plow-technologies)


An implementation of Python's doctest for Haskell (by sol)
Our great sponsors
  • Scout APM - Truly a developer’s best friend
  • SonarLint - Clean code begins in your IDE with SonarLint
  • talent.io - Download talent.io’s Tech Salary Report
  • InfluxDB - Build time-series-based applications quickly and at scale.
tasty-groundhog-converters DocTest
0 2
1 339
- -
0.0 5.2
over 6 years ago 7 days ago
Haskell Haskell
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.


Posts with mentions or reviews of tasty-groundhog-converters. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning tasty-groundhog-converters yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.


Posts with mentions or reviews of DocTest. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-10-19.
  • Why is the debugger so bad in Haskell? (or is it just me)
    3 projects | reddit.com/r/haskell | 19 Oct 2021
    Try to restrict your types even on sub functions (inside where), use testing, break down your code to the most atomic parts, using ghci to debug each part once at a time, and because Haskell doesn't let you reuse variables, or mutate state, it's a lot easier to rationalize evaluation order (which makes it a lot easier to debug without step debuggers compared to languages like python).

What are some alternatives?

When comparing tasty-groundhog-converters and DocTest you can also consider the following projects:

tasty - Modern and extensible testing framework for Haskell


titan - Testing Infrastructure for Temporal AbstractioNs

silvi - Haskell library for generating fake data.

hspec - A Testing Framework for Haskell

hspec-wai - Helpers to test WAI applications with Hspec

fuzzcheck - A library for testing monadic code in the spirit of QuickCheck

smallcheck - Test your Haskell code by exhaustively checking its properties


smartcheck - A Smarter QuickCheck

quickspec - Equational laws for free