tape VS WebdriverIO

Last but not least important are ava, uvu and tape; they are a really light and fast test runners.

A more minimalist approach is this tape module and the TAP protocol. https://www.npmjs.com/package/tape

OK will do. Do you have any tips on finding a suitable project? Ideally I was hoping to to contribute to a piece of software that I actually use/know/like/want to improve. Given that, and my area of expertise, I had shortlisted Signal Desktop, and Tape.

For us at Begin and Architect, tape has been in use for several years. tape has a stable and straightforward API, routine maintenance updates, and outputs TAP, making it really versatile. While TAP is legible, it's not the most human-readable format. Fortunately, several TAP reporters can help display results for developers. Until recently, Begin's TAP reporter of choice was tap-spec. Sadly tap-spec wasn't kept up to date and npm began reporting vulnerabilities.

I really enjoy Ava [1] or anything assert-tape-like [2]. "uvu" [3] is getting a lot of love lately, but it's very feature limited and much of it's touted advantages are at the detriment to feature set.

[1] https://github.com/avajs/ava

[2] https://github.com/substack/tape

[3] https://github.com/lukeed/uvu

Jest is great for front-end (or full stack integration) testing, but I feel it's specialized for that use-case and doesn't always play nice with backend/middle-tier testing needs.

-Jest -React testing library -Enzyme -Sinon -Mocha -Chai -AVA -Tape

Tape

This is only a basic implementation, including a testing framework like tape to make things more convenient. But it illustrates what even a simple integration test requires to work.

I am familiar with unit testing (using Tape). But if I understand correctly, things like HTTP requests fall more in the category of integration testing, rather than unit testing?

3.WebdriverIO: WebdriverIO is another popular open-source test automation framework. Key Features: Integrates well with popular testing frameworks (e.g., Mocha, Jasmine). Supports both synchronous and asynchronous commands. Works with various browsers and platforms

Webdriver.io

WebdriverIO (abbreviated as WDIO) is an E2E testing framework for Node.js. It allows you to automate all kinds of web and mobile applications using the Webdriver or Chrome DevTools protocols.

Curate your repo’s dashboard for your team’s benefit by checking in relevant VS Code settings into your version control system. Install Marquee and give it a shot.

My team uses Vue.js. We use Karma/Mocha/Chai and Sinon and Vue Test Utils to test our Vue components. For E2E testing we use Webdriver.io, but have in the past used Selenium written in Kotlin, and also Cypress.

There were changes to node-fibers that broke at least one thing I used, the sync mode of WebdriverIO. https://github.com/webdriverio/webdriverio/discussions/6702

Ever since WebdriverIO got launched, major companies adopted this tool for automation. It became popular very fast due to its powerful advantages. Since the launch, there have been lots of changes and improvements being made to the tool. In this article, we'll be discussing one of the improvements that have really helped us in writing automation scripts in async mode.

WebdriverIO is asynchronous by nature. Earlier, WebdriverIO used to provide the ability to run commands in sync mode using node-fibers. However, due to some breaking changes in Chromium, WebdriverIO discontinued the support for sync mode. Please refer Sync vs. Async Mode and this issue for more information.

-Selenium -Webdriver -Cypress -Puppeteer -Cucumber.js -Nightwatch.js

Selenium, Webdriver