swup VS ultra

Sure, you can use any number of JS-avoidance libraries. I'm a fan of Turbo, and there's also htmx, Unpoly, Alpine, hyperscript, swup, barba.js, and probably others.

Swup is this nice page transition library I found recently : https://swup.js.org/

2. The newly released fragment-plugin [3] that provides a declarative API for dynamically replacing containers based on rules

I can now finally build websites that tick all three boxes:

1. Visually impressive, fun, and snappy by using swup's first-class support for animations[4], cache[5], and preload capacities[6], enhanced with fragment visits as seen on the demo site.

2. Accessible by being able to serve server-rendered semantic markup that will fully work even with JavaScript disabled (try it out on the demo site!). On top of that, swup's a11y plugin[7] will automatically announce page visits to assistive technologies and will focus the new `

` element after each visit.

3. Because now all I need for my fancy frontend is a bit of progressive JavaScript, I can choose whatever tool I like on the server, keeping complexity low and maintainability high. I can use SSGs like eleventy or Astro (the demo site is built using Astro!), I can use any CMS like WordPress or ProcessWire, or a framework like Laravel. And I don't have to maintain an additional node server for SSG!

And all it took was 20 years! ;)

[0] https://github.com/swup/swup

So what are View Transitions good for? In short, they allow adding animated page transitions. Although we already have several standard options to animate stuff on web pages (CSS Transitions, CSS Animations or the Web Animations API) and countless more options in particular JavaScript frameworks and libraries (Framer Motion for React, Vue Transitions, Svelte Transitions, Swup, Barba.js or Animate.css to name just a few), the web still lacks a generic, standards-based and easy-to-use solution to animate transitions between pages or during DOM updates. At least that’s what Google engineers say and I tend to agree with them.

Is https://turbo.hotwired.dev/ my replacement? Or Swup.js?

I've used https://swup.js.org/. Simple to setup with one of the built in/contributed themes, haven't tried building a custom theme however. Also has a lot of good plugins for eg. accessibility. I used it in combination with Astro so a static site with a separate html file for each page.

Like Gatsby or Next, Astro does not have any client side navigation. So each link click triggers a full page reload. Astro recommends to use Swup as mentioned here. Turbo is also another option though the team does not recommend it. I'm currently using Swup which I'll probably switch from or completely remove it as I have added TOC to MDX and clicking on a title is not redirecting the page to that particular section.

I've come across swup , HighwayJS and barba js

Another option is ultra.

Ultra is another option if you want to use Deno with React: https://ultrajs.dev

Ultra Docs

In answer to your specific question of "can it replace my current npm + web pack workflow". The answer is more complex. Can you use npm? For the most part yes. Can you use Webpack specifically? That I'm not sure of, but there are a number of tools that occupy the same niche in the Deno ecosystem such as Packup as well as full-brown server/client frameworks like Fresh and Ultra

I hear you but a lot of devs refused to use Deno because it did not support npm. If you want to develop npm-free use Ultra: https://ultrajs.dev

If you really want SPA, Ultra(https://ultrajs.dev) is a good choice.

Take a look at Ultra (http://ultrajs.dev) and throw away most of your build tools. If you need to compile SCSS to CSS, try denosass (https://github.com/hironichu/denosass).

In this article, you’ll learn about a new React framework called Ultra, which uses Deno and React and focuses on using web streams and native features within the browser.

I think you were looking at one of the ancillary repos like create-ultra-app and not the main repo here: https://github.com/exhibitionist-digital/ultra