Swiper VS Mo.js

SwiperJS?, they’ve got plenty of templates there.

Maybe swiper? https://www.npmjs.com/package/swiper

just use https://swiperjs.com/ ... has all the usability imho.

That said, B2 does not include a photo viewer. However, folks who know html can easily add a photo viewer. For instance, we posted this example album to help developers learn how to read files using Python. This sample album uses the open source Swiper album.

You mention YAGNI, but I think the bigger blocker is "Don't reinvent the wheel" - which I think is the most misunderstood bit of programming advice out there. In my SvelteKit app, I am not using a "UI Framework" that provides components to me. I don't need to. Svelte is simple enough that I can build almost anything myself. I've looked at Skeleton's source code, and their components on average are not better than versions I have rolled myself. There are a few cases where it's better to use a framework. Sliders, for instance, have a lot of edge cases. So I use Swiper for carousels. But even then, I could build a working basic slider (that doesn't address the numerous edge cases) myself in an hour. The other case is Headless UI but even there, I disagree with how he implemented some things and it's possible to roll your own Svelte Headless UI just from Tailwind's source.

Hello everyone! I'm trying to keep the arrows in SwiperJS from overlapping on my slides, but I can't seem to find a working/viable solution. I've checked this post out, https://github.com/nolimits4web/swiper/issues/3736, but the first solution mentioned just makes the arrows disappear and I can't figure out how to fix the CSS to restyle them, and the second solution mentioned just seems very temporary. If anyone could help with any suggestions or ideas to solve this problem, it would be very much appreciated! Thank you!

Mo.js is a potent and adaptable JavaScript animation library with a straightforward API and browser support. It's distinguished by its high-performance animations and density-independent effects, ensuring outstanding visual quality on any device. Mo.js provides extensive tools for animation creation, including Player for animation control, Curve Editor, and Timeline Editor for custom easing and editing.

mojs.github.io

Javascript touch events paired with WebGL would be the route I’d go. There are some really great libraries for WebGL (twojs) or working with SVG (mojs) if you want to keep it simple

13. mo.js

d)MoJS

I've looked around and found Mo.js which seems super cool, but it doesn't look like animations can be exported as a video? I want to avoid having to screen record if I can because I feel like the video quality is never as good as had it been directly exported.

Animation. You are creative, and you want your site to grab users' attention at first sight. JavaScript is there for you. With modern frameworks and libraries, such as Three.js,Anime.js,Mo.js any imaginable animation is possible.