|over 5 years ago||over 4 years ago|
|BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License||BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License|
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Is there any hard evidence that functional programming is better?
2 projects | /r/functionalprogramming | 6 Apr 2021
It got them 11 votes up. I asked to actually make this argument and received -4. Both sides of the claim are false, the left witnessed by things like Copilot and Obsidian, the right by the criticism of the functional style by Jon Harrop. If this is what you mean by «that is the point most of the comments tried to make» then, well, they should try harder if intellectual honesty and integrity are sought at all.
We haven't tracked posts mentioning haskell-tools-ast yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
What are some alternatives?
copilot - A stream-based runtime-verification framework for generating hard real-time C code.
language-thrift - Haskell parser for the Thrift IDL format.
lens-toml-parser - Lenses for toml-parser
CoreErlang - AST, parser, pretty-printer for Core Erlang source code.
ghc-justdoit - A magic typeclass that just does it
haskell-tools-ast - Developer tools for Haskell
really-simple-xml-parser - A really simple xml parser in Haskell using Parsec
language-fortran - Haskell parser and manipulation functions for Fortran code
toml-parser - Haskell parser and printer for the TOML 1.0.0 file format
liquid-fixpoint - Horn Clause Constraint Solving for Liquid Types