styletron VS classnames

Compare styletron vs classnames and see what are their differences.

styletron

:zap: Toolkit for component-oriented styling (by styletron)

classnames

A simple javascript utility for conditionally joining classNames together (by JedWatson)
Our great sponsors
  • SurveyJS - Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
styletron classnames
5 93
3,321 17,316
-0.1% -
6.5 8.3
3 months ago about 7 hours ago
TypeScript JavaScript
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

styletron

Posts with mentions or reviews of styletron. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-09.
  • Tailwind CSS v3
    9 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 9 Dec 2021
    Some technical thoughts as someone who could care less about fanboyism:

    - One point where atomic CSS frameworks are supposed to shine over conventional CSS is bundle size, since they (at least the good ones) compile to only a single rule for any used value, rather than potentially repeating rules for semantically different classes.

    - Another point where atomic CSS frameworks shine is just sheer volume of banging code out. When the bulk of your output is visual, mastering tools based on shorthands like tailwind, emmet, etc can feel very productive.

    - Purely atomic CSS frameworks can make some workflows more difficult, e.g. by having too granular call sites and not allowing "let's see what happens to the overall theme if I do this design change" iterative style of work, or because workflows that edit CSS on the fly via browser devtools can no longer be used to limit impact within semantic lines (e.g. "I want to change padding only on buttons, without breaking everything else that happens to depend on the same padding value"). There are both design-oriented and debugging-oriented workflows that are affected in similar ways.

    - You generally don't get visual regressions at a distance w/ atomic CSS. This matters at organizations where desire for pixel precision and simultaneously fickle design teams are the norm. But conversely, "can we just change the font size to be a bit bigger across the site" can often run into issues of missed spots. On a similar note, designs may become inconsistent across a site over time due to the hyper local nature of atomic CSS oriented development.

    - Custom rules may as well be written in APL[0]; they usually aren't documented and it takes a "you-gotta-know-them-to-know-them" sort of familiarity to be able to work with them (or get back to them after a while).

    - There are some tools that mix and match atomic CSS with other paradigms. For example, styletron[0] can output atomic CSS for the bundling benefits, but looks like React styled components from a devexp perspective, and has rendering modes that output traditional-looking debug classes for chrome devtool oriented workflows.

    The main theme to be aware of: proponents rarely talk of maintenance, so beware of honeymoon effect. Detractors often omit that traditional CSS (especially at scale) also requires a lot of diligence to maintain. So think about maintenance and how AOP[1] vs hyperlocal development workflows interact with your organization's design culture.

    [0] https://www.styletron.org/

    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect-oriented_programming

  • 5 React.js UI Component libraries.
    9 projects | dev.to | 11 Aug 2021
    It is created, managed, and utilized by Uber. It includes a wide range of attractive components, with accessibility as the top focus. It is quick since it is built with the Styletron engine. Style overrides can be used to tweak themes, but in my experience, I've never required them because the design vibe they're trying for is precisely what I want.
  • Just-In-Time: The Next Generation of Tailwind CSS
    4 projects | /r/javascript | 15 Mar 2021
    [0] https://www.styletron.org/ [1] https://baseweb.design/blog/getting-started-with-styletron#getting-started-with-styletron
  • @blocz/react-responsive v3 is out
    3 projects | dev.to | 12 Mar 2021
    When we created the library, we were using styletron for our styles, and we wanted to bind the breakpoints we defined in @blocz/react-responsive with the breakpoints used for our styles.

classnames

Posts with mentions or reviews of classnames. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-29.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing styletron and classnames you can also consider the following projects:

clsx - A tiny (239B) utility for constructing `className` strings conditionally.

styled-components - Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅

tailwind-merge - Merge Tailwind CSS classes without style conflicts

chakra-ui - ⚡️ Simple, Modular & Accessible UI Components for your React Applications

emotion - 👩‍🎤 CSS-in-JS library designed for high performance style composition

linaria - Zero-runtime CSS in JS library

React CSS Modules - Seamless mapping of class names to CSS modules inside of React components.

vite-plugin-sass-dts - This is a plugin that automatically creates a type file when using the CSS module type-safely.

Fela - State-Driven Styling in JavaScript

Radium - A toolchain for React component styling.

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development.