styled-components VS Materialize

First of all I'm using Sass and CSS Modules if you've seen some of my earlier posts you'll have seen I used to use styled-components and whilst I think they have their place I'm much happier using CSS Modules.

I'm using react and electron, if matters... I'm reading the docs of styled-components but I still couldn't figure out how to scope existing third-party libraries.

You don't have to use CSS files, you can use libraries such as styled-components that allow you to create reusable styled components:

I had trouble naming this question and it seems quite broad, so, forgive me oh moderators. I'm trying out styled components for the first time and trying to integrate it into my react app. I have the following so far:

styled-components

Here at Anvil, we use styled-components. PurgeCSS functionality is essentially baked into styled-components, with a few caveats. If PurgeCSS is already included in styled-components, can you still use both? And if you can, is there any benefit to doing so?

CSS-in-JS category of tooling (JSS, Styled-Components, etc.) does 'inline++' styling, which also has the added benefit of placing style information right next to template.

I have a ref on a component I am converting over to a styled component in my app. The ref is used to access the offsetHeight and scrollHeight properties on the raw html element of the component. Once I switched this component to a styled component, the ref now points to the styled component instead of the raw html element, and I'm unsure how to reference the base element. Can this be done?

Let's say that you are a happy user of styled-components. Everything is great until you decide to adopt integrate server-side rendering (SSR). Getting something like this set up has huge benefits:

Material (from Google)

Well, there are CSS frameworks like Bootstrap and Materialize. If you can be more specific about what you're looking for someone can probably recommend something.

I went through the home page of materializecss and materialUI. The first one mentions A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design and the later one mentions React components that implement Google's Material Design. Both of them implements material design and both of them give me components to use. Where exactly is the difference between both of them?

After having looking through Material Design and Materialize, I set out for my next web application project. First, I looked at some new books and visited some libraries and immediately fell in love with the library atmosphere.

It may be worth noting that if you have hammerjs installed and your components are still not rendering correctly to make sure you are using angular material components and not html elements with materialize-css classes.If you are using materialize-css instead of angular material, you will need to add it to your project separately.

✓ JQuery ✓ Responsive mobile friendly design ✓ Mobile drop-down menu ✓ Lazy loading ✓ Youtube like preloader progress bar ✓ Back to top icon ✓ Cookies (js-cookie) ✓ SEO meta tags (Google, Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest...) ✓ Structured data and cards ✓ Using IPFS to stream and download mp3 ✓ M3U files ✓ Torrent download ✓ Responsive HTML5 media player ✓ Stylish rounded social sharing icons menu ✓ Media Elements ready ✓ HLS: to stream and cache MP3 ✓ PWA ( Service worker, IOS and Android compatible, manifest file...) ✓ Multilingual website (Google Seo optimized) ✓ Materializecss ✓ Hit counter: to calculate the number of visit to each page using Firebase firestore. ✓ Favorite: save pages to favorite using localStorage. ✓ Filter receiters with alphabet, number of visit or by favorite. ✓ Search for receiters by name filter.

if you have a few days, you are probably able to make a nice looking site with either materializecss or bootstrap, you'll then be able to upload the files to a host like krystal.

Github Issue: https://github.com/Dogfalo/materialize/issues/5995

> The fact of the matter was that _servers aren't actually easy_. Caddy v1 tried to give the illusion that it is, but it just caused more problems, really.

You know, as someone who used Caddy v1 pretty extensively (still probably have it running on some of my homelab boxes), i never really ran into those supposed problems. Maybe they'd manifest in more complex configurations, but as a reverse proxy, file host, web server that's integrated with PHP or even something to allow setting up basicauth, i never found it to be lacking.

That's not to say that Caddy v2 is bad, just that someone for whom v1 worked perfectly might find it a bit cumbersome to move to the newer version, as the old one is no longer supported. Of course, you can say the same about JDK 8 vs JDK 11+ etc.

> Also, any time someone brings up the malicious fork "wedge", it saddens me.

If i recall correctly, it just took the project and rebranded it, which isn't necessarily malicious (for example, aggregating and selling users' data would). That's the nature of open source - anyone who wants to do that, can.

Of course, i think that the fork is also irrelevant because they couldn't actually be bothered to maintain the fork and nobody cared for it, much like how other projects, like Materialize.css, ended up.

For example, here's the original: https://github.com/Dogfalo/materialize

Then someone got upset that the project was abandoned (even though they were taking folks Patreon money): https://github.com/Dogfalo/materialize/issues/6615

They created a fork of their own: https://github.com/materializecss/materialize

Which promptly died down because there just wasn't enough interest in maintaining it. That's just how things go sometime.