stevenarella
flathub
Our great sponsors
stevenarella | flathub | |
---|---|---|
12 | 114 | |
1,421 | 1,051 | |
- | 1.8% | |
0.0 | 6.8 | |
9 days ago | 6 days ago | |
Rust | ||
Apache License 2.0 | GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
stevenarella
-
I’m on a crusade
Client side: - https://github.com/Thinkofname/steven - https://github.com/iceiix/stevenarella - https://github.com/DarkZek/RustCraft
- Minecraft - Rust Edition
- Minecraft in Minecraft… powered by Rust.
- Stevenarella: Multi-protocol Minecraft-compatible client written in Rust
-
[Media] Announcing Valence: A Rust Framework for Building Minecraft Servers
stevenarella perhaps? 🙂
-
Is it possible to make a Minecraft mod in Rust(lang)?
I suppose you could mod Stevenarella, which is a libre Minecraft client written in Rust, but it's very incomplete.
-
"I'd liken this to rape, actually"
Not paladin-levels of morality? https://github.com/iceiix/stevenarella/issues/562
-
Leafish, a work-in-progress open-source alternative Minecraft client written in Rust
iceiix, the dev of stevenarella, is not as active sadly and it can take quite a while for them to respond to issues and pull requests. There was also a disagreement on the direction of a part of the project. If you check some Github discussions there were some discussions about it and this fork was made to accelerate development and do some large changes (e.g. remove web support, making the application multithreaded, move to a modern renderer, etc).
-
Looking for a free Minecraft client that doesn't use any of Mojang's code.
I haven't tried this project personally, but https://github.com/iceiix/stevenarella seems to be what you are looking for. It is an interesting thought that perhaps it is possible to play minecraft with completely free software.
-
Feather, A Minecraft server implementation in Rust
There's also stevenarella, an implementation of the Minecraft client in Rust. I found these two projects just googling to see if anyone had ever attempted to do reimplementations of these things, and Feather was the first result. I'm both surprised and not surprised by how little known these projects are, including other Minecraft reimplemtations. Since I didn't know, I thought maybe other people who didn't know might be interested.
flathub
-
XZ backdoor story – Initial analysis
> Nobody ever even audits the binary contents of flatpaks on flathub (were they actually built from the source? the author attests so!).
IME/IIRC There aren't (or shouldn't be) any binary contents on Flathub that are submitted by the author, at least for projects with source available? You're supposed to submit a short, plain-text recipe instead, which then gets automatically built from source outside the control of the author.
> The Flathub service then uses the manifest from your repository to continuously build and distribute your application on every commit.
https://docs.flathub.org/docs/for-app-authors/submission/#ho...
Usually the recipes should just list the appropriate URLs to get the source code, or, for proprietary applications, the official .DEBs. Kinda like AUR, but JSON/YAML. Easy to audit if you want:
- FOSS software is probably less likely to abuse this, but it just depends how ruthless the publisher is, a lot of people desire to be successful and it's human nature to look for advantages to put yourself above others in competitive environments.
-
Flathub – The Linux App Store
I also don't believe third parties maintainers packaging software on flathub is a big issue but I'm also not familiar with how other distro repos trust their maintainers. Hopefully more developers maintain their flatpak themselves (or someone they trust) and get their apps verified. If most apps are verified, warning users of unverified apps might be a good idea.
There's ongoing discussion about splitting open source and proprietary apps in to seperate repos [1]. Additionally having seperate repos for verified and unverified apps might make it more obvious where an app comes from in the cli.
But I don't know how seamlessly an app could transition between being in the third party repo and being in the official repo. Having the user quietly stop receiving updates seems like a bad idea, but automatically migrating might not be desirable either.
I also think flatpaks cli interface needs some work. It is functional but far from distro package managers.
Being verified is especially important for critical apps. Recently someone added malicious versions of apps to the snap store [3]. This lead to people getting their cryptocurrency stolen.
[1] https://github.com/flathub/flathub/issues/691
[2] https://docs.flathub.org/docs/for-app-authors/requirements
[3] https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/temporary-suspension-of-automat...
-
Bforartists Flatpak, coming soon to Flathub
That means Linux users can now install Bforartists on any Linux distro easily, regardless of glibc version! https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/4295
-
Turtle 0.3 released (formerly TurtleGit)
Still having some problems with the flathub build, see https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/4082 for the current status.
-
TurtleGit released, a git frontend for GNOME and Nautilus
Here is the flathub draft pull request: https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/4082
-
The first tip to give to any new Linux user should be "do NOT search for, download, and install software on the Web!"
i assume you dont know how flathub works , theirs little or no QC , done flathub is just get told theirs an update for the package , if yo go look at the github repo pes https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/4164 for example , only updates the link to the girt repo , theirs 0 code checked
-
Who is behind flathub and rpmfusion really?
It all should be written in pages for contributors, read the docs for fusion, and the docs for flathub.
-
Flathub just hit 1 billion total downloads
These are criticisms of the flatpak ecosystem as it stands today. Currently, the Firefox ESR package on flathub seems to be caught in limbo or maybe dead. Mozilla publishes both a snap and a flatpak of Firefox latest, but only a snap of the ESR version. This raises the question of why. Have Mozilla chosen to invest more in snaps than in flatpaks? If so, what's their reasoning? (More users on snaps, making it similar to why they put more investment into Windows than Linux? Something else?) If they haven't invested more into snaps than flatpaks, is this a sign that it's harder to maintain flatpaks (or at least on flathub) than snaps? If that's true, I would hope that flatpak/flathub would be soliciting feedback from Mozilla about it.
-
VirtualBox as Flatpak
Because that may be very hard to sandbox: https://github.com/flathub/flathub/issues/3366
What are some alternatives?
Leafish - A minecraft-like multi version client implemented in Rust.
ZeroTier-GUI - A Linux front-end for ZeroTier
web-minecraft - PoC Minecraft client written in Javascript (1.16.5 offline mode working)
Ryujinx - Experimental Nintendo Switch Emulator written in C#
MultiMC5 - A custom launcher for Minecraft that allows you to easily manage multiple installations of Minecraft at once [Moved to: https://github.com/MultiMC/Launcher]
bubblewrap - Low-level unprivileged sandboxing tool used by Flatpak and similar projects
WASI - WebAssembly System Interface
flatpak - Linux application sandboxing and distribution framework
github-drama - "This conversation has been locked and limited to collaborators."
openbsd-wip - OpenBSD work in progress ports
steam-runtime - A runtime environment for Steam applications