Standard Notes VS ShareLaTex

Our website isn't open-source, but the tools that are used to convert notes and our web app are. 🙂

If you really had to, say for a temporary copy paste onto a different device, I recommend Standard Notes. It's an open source, end-to-end encrypted note service that worked really well for me.

Yes, you'll need a standard notes account for it to work. You can register here https://app.standardnotes.org/ or download the app from the website https://standardnotes.com/ and then register within the app.

Trying to log into my self hosted Docker syncing-server instance, using the web client at https://app.standardnotes.org.

The desktop apps do not support the processors typically used for Raspberry Pi OS (or Pinebooks/phones) at the moment. In the meantime, you can use our web app at app.standardnotes.org. 🙂

Hi there, sorry to hear that. Are you able to sign into the web app? Which version of the app are you using (it's located at the bottom of the settings page) and where did you download it from?

You can sign into another app, such as the web app, to ensure that the changes you've made have been synced. Sort your notes by Date Modified (on each client), inspect the tags pane, check the Archived & Trash folders, and compare the contents in the web app with the other apps that you are using.

I think u/basicslovakguy is already alluding to it, but if it's only the application passcode, have you tried logging in from the web? https://app.standardnotes.org/

I guess this is a competitor to services such as overleaf [1] and codimd [2]. Although this is yet another syntax, it seems to be supported by pandoc [3]. Lately, I have been using Quarto [4] more and more as I program in R, which also produces very nice outputs, especially HTML. But none of these solve the academic usage problems of (1) producing nice diffs for reviewers, and (2) can easily be shared with, and commented by, non-technical collaborators. Thus, I fear Word will be difficult to replace for many years, at least in my field, for scientific writing

[1] https://github.com/overleaf/overleaf

[2] https://github.com/hackmdio/codimd

[3] https://pandoc.org/typst-property-output.html

[4] https://quarto.org/

Looking at the commits history[1], they are very probably using something else than (public) GitHub for many Pull Requests. On Friday, there were 7 pull requests merge and more commits referencing merge requests not available on GitHub.

[1] https://github.com/overleaf/overleaf/commits/main/

you can already self host it https://github.com/overleaf/overleaf

Mostly open source... Here's the repo: https://github.com/overleaf/overleaf. But you can see what features are only available in the paid versions here

Overleaf's license. I highly suggest reading point 10. I only skimmed it, but there are probably other pertinent details.

Look at the project license: https://github.com/overleaf/overleaf/blob/main/LICENSE