stable-diffusion VS onnx

Which is a 1-click install of Stable Diffusion with an alternative web interface. You can choose a different approach but this one is pretty simple and I am new to this stuff.

an invisible watermarking of the outputs, to help viewers identify the images as machine-generated.

Agree. The Stable Diffusion Open RAIL M license: "You agree not to use the Model or Derivatives of the Model ... To defame, disparage or otherwise harass others"

Does "disparage" have a settled meaning in law?

https://github.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion/blob/main/LICENS...

If you downloaded from https://github.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion that's the problem. It's the real Stable Diffusion, but not what you want to use to generate images. The most popular Stable Diffusion interface is https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui. Make sure to read the install instructions.

sure thing!

Read the official docs for Stable Diffusion.

Stable Diffusion (2D Image Generation and Animation) https://github.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion (Stable Diffusion V1) https://huggingface.co/CompVis/stable-diffusion (Stable Diffusion Checkpoints 1.1-1.4) https://huggingface.co/runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5 (Stable Diffusion Checkpoint 1.5) https://github.com/Stability-AI/stablediffusion (Stable Difusion V2) https://huggingface.co/stabilityai/stable-diffusion-2-1/tree/main (Stable Diffusion Checkpoint 2.1) Stable Diffusion Automatic 1111 Webui and Extensions https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui (WebUI - Easier to use) PLEASE NOTE, MANY EXTENSIONS CAN BE INSTALLED FROM THE WEBUI BY CLICK "AVAILABLE" OR "INSTALL FROM URL" BUT YOU MAY STILL NEED TO DOWNLOAD THE MODEL CHECKPOINTS! https://github.com/Mikubill/sd-webui-controlnet (Control Net Extension - Use various models to control your image generation, useful for animation and temporal consistency) https://huggingface.co/lllyasviel/ControlNet/tree/main/models (Control Net Checkpoints -Canny, Normal, OpenPose, Depth, ect.) https://github.com/thygate/stable-diffusion-webui-depthmap-script (Depth Map Extension - Generate high-resolution depthmaps and animated videos or export to 3d modeling programs) https://github.com/graemeniedermayer/stable-diffusion-webui-normalmap-script (Normal Map Extension - Generate high-resolution normal maps for use in 3d programs) https://github.com/d8ahazard/sd_dreambooth_extension (Dream Booth Extension - Train your own objects, people, or styles into Stable Diffusion) https://github.com/deforum-art/sd-webui-deforum (Deforum - Generate Weird 2D animations) https://github.com/deforum-art/sd-webui-text2video (Deforum Text2Video - Generate videos from texts prompts using ModelScope or VideoCrafter)

Once your model has been trained and validated using Anomalib, the next step is to prepare it for real-time implementation. This is where ONNX (Open Neural Network Exchange) or OpenVINO (Open Visual Inference and Neural network Optimization) comes into play.

ONNX is an open format from the Linux Foundation to represent machine learning models. It is becoming extensively adopted by the Machine Learning community and is compatible with most of the machine learning frameworks like PyTorch, TensorFlow, etc. Converting a model between any of those formats and ONNX is really simple and can be done in most cases with a single command.

ONNX[0], model-as-protosbufs, continuing to gain adoption will hopefully solve this issue.

[0] https://github.com/onnx/onnx

ONNX is a format for representing machine learning models in a portable way. Additionally, ONNX models can be easily optimized and thus become smaller and faster.

I would say onnx.ai [0] provides more information about ONNX for those who aren’t working with ML/DL.

[0] https://onnx.ai

This kind of indirection through standardisation is pretty common to make compatibility between different kinds of software components easier. Some other good examples are the LSP project from Microsoft and ONNX to represent machine learning models. The first provides a standard so that IDEs don't have to re-invent the weel for every programming language. The latter decouples training frameworks from inference frameworks. Going back to WSGI, you can find a pretty extensive rationale for the WSGI standard here if interested.

Sounds interesting, ONNX runtime - what I use - can also be run with WebAssembly and on CPU, on all major GPUs, and it supports many programming languages, though C++ is its direct form.

No, it's that AMD doesn't fucking need to. If anything, it the owners of ONNX that needs to convince developers that their technology is worth learning and using it to implement solutions, whether it's on laptops or phones or Raspberry Fucking Pi.