sqlitebrowser VS Cryptomator

Compare sqlitebrowser vs Cryptomator and see what are their differences.

sqlitebrowser

Official home of the DB Browser for SQLite (DB4S) project. Previously known as "SQLite Database Browser" and "Database Browser for SQLite". Website at: (by sqlitebrowser)

Cryptomator

Multi-platform transparent client-side encryption of your files in the cloud (by cryptomator)
Our great sponsors
  • Sonar - Write Clean C++ Code. Always.
  • InfluxDB - Access the most powerful time series database as a service
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
sqlitebrowser Cryptomator
241 444
17,831 9,102
1.3% 3.6%
9.2 9.7
11 days ago 3 days ago
C++ Java
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later GNU General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

sqlitebrowser

Posts with mentions or reviews of sqlitebrowser. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-03-03.

Cryptomator

Posts with mentions or reviews of Cryptomator. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-03-16.
  • Amazon Photos just ate 240,364 of my photos
    17 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 16 Mar 2023
  • Should I ditch 1Password?
    2 projects | reddit.com/r/privacy | 14 Mar 2023
    KeepassXC or at least cryptomator
  • Is it possible to end-to-end encrypt a VPS?
    2 projects | reddit.com/r/selfhosted | 12 Mar 2023
  • [Software] Help me find a notepad with encryption as a backup method to store my passwords
    2 projects | reddit.com/r/privacy | 7 Mar 2023
    Cryptomator is an easy solution for saving things in an encrypted container for efficient upload to the cloud.
  • Synology DSM 7.2 Beta NOW LIVE
    2 projects | reddit.com/r/synology | 7 Mar 2023
    I went the other way. I moved everything to the cloud and installed Cryptomator on everybody’s phones. It also registers as a file provider, and seamlessly encrypts everything you put in it.
  • Prepping for Flooding
    2 projects | reddit.com/r/preppers | 3 Mar 2023
    Use something like Cryptomator (GUI) or Rclone (CLI) to upload your documents encrypted so even Google can't snoop. Completely safe and off site.
  • Linux software list. Discussion and advice welcome!
    36 projects | reddit.com/r/linuxquestions | 23 Feb 2023
    Cryptomator - data encryption for all file types and folders
  • Encrypted drive with automatic sync for Linux?
    2 projects | reddit.com/r/PrivacyGuides | 20 Feb 2023
    I've only used the desktop client for Cryptomator on Windows but they have a Linux one too. Creates an encrypted folder which you then put in your non-encrypted untrustworthy cloud sync folder (Dropbox, Google Drive, or whatever).
  • Store files inside of YouTube videos
    10 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 20 Feb 2023
  • Self hosting in 2023 and why you should do that
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 19 Feb 2023
    Sorry to be the "grumpy old man", but i don't get it.

    In my experience, self hosting usually falls into two categories, people that "just want to host a simple static website", and "host all the things", and both are usually served better by using the cloud.

    Most are in the category "i want to learn about self hosting", meaning they have (close to) zero experience, and while self hosting by itself isn't hard, maintaining a secure environment is, and that's where many people fail.

    For the "simple static website", you can host it for free pretty much everywhere you like. Github pages, Azure static web apps, and countless others all offer stable, professional cloud servies for free, without the risk of exposing your network to the internet.

    For the "host all the things", you see people attempting to mimic and entire data center at home, complete with monitoring, CI/CD and everything, and while i appreciate the learning experience, most people are blissfully unaware of the chore it is to maintain such a thing. Most of these services are better off being in the cloud.

    - email is a likely thing people will want to self host, which is also perhaps the most stupid thing to do. First of all, it is a chore to keep your server off of various block lists, and you gain nothing but pain by self hosting it. Email is insecure by design. Every email has at least 2 parties, the sender and the receiver, and with >50% of the worlds recipients running on Google/Microsoft/Yahoo/whatever, your email will get indexed. A much better alternative is letting someone who knows what they're doing host your email, and use a personal domain. That way you can move your MX records if need be, still maintain your email address if changing provider, and let someone else deal with the problems of running the service. If it's privacy you want, use something else, or use encryption. In both cases, self hosting gives you nothing additional.

    - cloud storage is another contender, and the most common "excuse" is that cloud hosting is too expensive, and yes, if you plan to store 200TB in the cloud then it is, but maybe instead you need to look at which files are needed when away from home, and use the cloud for those, and leave the rest at home, accessible by VPN if need be. If you need privacy with cloud file hosting, something like Cryptomator (https://cryptomator.org/) is much easier/better than maintaining your own server. (as a side note, you can get around 20TB of cloud storage for €20/month, or roughly the price of the electricity required to run a 4 drive NAS for the same time, but not including cost of hardware).

    Not matter your setup at home, you will never create something as resilient as the major cloud datacenters. i.e. OneDrive (paid version) stores your files across multiple geographically separated data centers, using erasure coding, so if one data center dies, your files are still available in another center, and hastily being replicated to a third center. It uses atomic writes (like CoW filesystems, ZFS, Btrfs, APFS, etc) to ensure data written is correct, and has checksumming (inherent in the erasure coding), as well as versioning of files (OneDrive has unlimited file versioning for 30 days rolling), meaning you get at least some ransomware protection.

    So in the end, most people are way better served by putting their stuff in the cloud and encrypting it, than they are exposing insecure services from home.

    By all means, build the cluster at home as a learning experience, but save yourself some trouble and keep it within your LAN. If you need to access it externally, use a VPN instead. With modern VPNs like wireguard, there is very little overhead, and your data will thank you for it (as will your family as you suddenly have a lot more time to spend with them!).

What are some alternatives?

When comparing sqlitebrowser and Cryptomator you can also consider the following projects:

rclone - "rsync for cloud storage" - Google Drive, S3, Dropbox, Backblaze B2, One Drive, Swift, Hubic, Wasabi, Google Cloud Storage, Yandex Files

sqlitestudio - A free, open source, multi-platform SQLite database manager.

VeraCrypt - Disk encryption with strong security based on TrueCrypt

gocryptfs - Encrypted overlay filesystem written in Go

dokany - User mode file system library for windows with FUSE Wrapper

sqlcipher - SQLCipher is a standalone fork of SQLite that adds 256 bit AES encryption of database files and other security features.

nocodb - 🔥 🔥 🔥 Open Source Airtable Alternative

Joplin - Joplin - an open source note taking and to-do application with synchronisation capabilities for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS.

beekeeper-studio - Modern and easy to use SQL client for MySQL, Postgres, SQLite, SQL Server, and more. Linux, MacOS, and Windows.

godot-sqlite - GDNative wrapper for SQLite (Godot 3.2+)

linux-cli-community - Linux command-line client for ProtonVPN. Written in Python.

dbhub.io - A "Cloud" for SQLite databases. Collaborative development for your data. :)