spack
NUR
Our great sponsors
spack | NUR | |
---|---|---|
52 | 24 | |
3,949 | 1,143 | |
2.3% | 5.1% | |
10.0 | 9.1 | |
3 days ago | 4 days ago | |
Python | Python | |
Apache-2.0 or MIT | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
spack
-
Autodafe: "freeing your freeing your project from the clammy grip of autotools."
> Are we talking about the same autotools?
Yes. Instead of figuring out how to do something particular with every single software package, I can do a --with-foo or --without-bar or --prefix=/opt/baz-1.2.3, and be fairly confident that it will work the way I want.
Certainly with package managers or (FreeBSD) Ports a lot is taken care of behind the scenes, but the above would also help the package/port maintainers as well. Lately I've been using Spack for special-needs compiles, but maintainer ease also helps there, but there are still cases one a 'fully manual' compile is still done.
> Suffice it to say, I prefer to work with handwritten makefiles.
Having everyone 'roll their own' system would probably be worse, because any "mysteriously failure" then has to be debugged specially for each project.
Have you tried Spack?
* https://spack.io
* https://spack.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
-
FreeBSD has a(nother) new C compiler: Intel oneAPI DPC++/C++
Well, good luck with that, cause it's broken.
Previous release miscompiled Python [1]
Current release miscompiles bison [2]
[1] https://github.com/spack/spack/issues/38724
[2] https://github.com/spack/spack/issues/37172#issuecomment-181...
-
Essential Command Line Tools for Developers
gh is available via Homebrew, MacPorts, Conda, Spack, Webi, and as a…
-
The Curious Case of MD5
> I can't count the number of times I've seen people say "md5 is fine for use case xyz" where in some counterintuitive way it wasn't fine.
I can count many more times that people told me that md5 was "broken" for file verification when, in fact, it never has been.
My main gripe with the article is that it portrays the entire legal profession as "backwards" and "deeply negligent" when they're not actually doing anything unsafe -- or even likely to be unsafe. And "tech" knows better. Much of tech, it would seem, has no idea about the use cases and why one might be safe or not. They just know something's "broken" -- so, clearly, we should update.
> Just use a safe one, even if you think you "don't need it".
Here's me switching 5,700 or so hashes from md5 to sha256 in 2019: https://github.com/spack/spack/pull/13185
Did I need it? No. Am I "compliant"? Yes.
Really, though, the main tangible benefit was that it saved me having to respond to questions and uninformed criticism from people unnecessarily worried about md5 checksums.
- Spack Package Manager v0.21.0
- Show HN: FlakeHub – Discover and publish Nix flakes
-
Nixhub: Search Historical Versions of Nix Packages
[1] https://github.com/spack/spack/blob/develop/var/spack/repos/...
-
Cython 3.0 Released
In Spack [1] we can express all these constraints for the dependency solver, and we also try to always re-cythonize sources. The latter is because bundled cythonized files are sometimes forward incompatible with Python, so it's better to just regenerate those with an up to date cython.
[1] https://github.com/spack/spack/
-
Linux server for physics simulations
You want to look at the tools used for HPC systems, these are generally very well tried and tested and can be setup for single machine usage. Remote access - we use ssh, but web interfaces such as Open On Demand exist - https://openondemand.org/. For managing Jobs, Slurm is currently the most popular option - https://slurm.schedmd.com/documentation.html. For a module system (to load software and libraries per user), Spack is a great - https://spack.io/. You might also want to consider containerisation options, https://apptainer.org/ is a good option.
-
Simplest way to get latest gcc for any platform ?
git clone https://github.com/spack/spack.git ./spack/bin/spack install gcc
NUR
-
Couple of noob questions
So first, I'm a bit confused about AUR. I'm not aware of what you're describing. I heard about AUR-like repo for Nix (called NUR https://github.com/nix-community/NUR).
-
Adding extensions to firefox using home manager
You need to use nur
-
How to install NordVPN onto NixOS
Hi, I'm the author of the PR :) I uploaded it to NUR precisely so that it would be available sooner. However, as I wrote in the thread yesterday, as of this PR one of the components the package was relying on was deprecated. I'm still trying to make it work again using the new buildFHSEnv. However, if you're running 22.11 or haven't updated your local version of nixpkgs beyond that PR, it should still work.
-
New BFF
Apart from nixpkgs having many packages, there is also NUR which has even more stuff.
-
Using a flake from a GitHub repo
You might also want to publish your sarc utility on NUR, https://nur.nix-community.org/
-
NixOS causes an error while booting
nur = import (builtins.fetchTarball "https://github.com/nix-community/NUR/archive/master.tar.gz") {
-
Is there NO alternative to the aur?
Nix also has the NUR. I have never needed to use it, while when I used arch I had many AUR packages.
-
Anyone figure out how to apply nvidia-patch in nixos?
Follow the NUR installation instructions and it should be in pkgs.nur.repos.arc.packages.nvidia-patch.
-
Best practices for organizing code repository for multiple machines? What about deployment?
As for the community repo, there's nur but only 120 people use it.. I think the reason nixpkgs is so big is that the community is pretty accepting of accepting loads of different packages.
-
Can one self host a nix package repo?
Some common options for the first: - your own git repo - your own flake (a specially constructed and easy to consume git repo) - something like NUR
What are some alternatives?
HomeBrew - 🍺 The missing package manager for macOS (or Linux)
Home Manager using Nix - Manage a user environment using Nix [maintainer=@rycee]
nixpkgs - Nix Packages collection & NixOS
nixos-search - Search NixOS packages and options
nix-processmgmt - Experimental Nix-based process management framework
nix-darwin - nix modules for darwin
Ansible - Ansible is a radically simple IT automation platform that makes your applications and systems easier to deploy and maintain. Automate everything from code deployment to network configuration to cloud management, in a language that approaches plain English, using SSH, with no agents to install on remote systems. https://docs.ansible.com.
emacs-overlay - Bleeding edge emacs overlay [maintainer=@adisbladis]
ohpc - OpenHPC Integration, Packaging, and Test Repo
nixos-generators - Collection of image builders [maintainer=@Lassulus]
NixOS-docker - DEPRECATED! Dockerfiles to package Nix in a minimal docker container
flake-utils-plus - Use Nix flakes without any fluff.