sortablejs
lit
Our great sponsors
sortablejs | lit | |
---|---|---|
24 | 141 | |
28,610 | 17,489 | |
0.8% | 1.8% | |
6.0 | 9.4 | |
3 days ago | 3 days ago | |
JavaScript | TypeScript | |
MIT License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
sortablejs
-
Multi-column drag and drop with SortableJS and Stimulus
Well, it worked. But only for one case: dragging stuff within only one column. You see, stimulus-sortable uses SortableJS under the hood, which is powerful.
-
Suggestions for a library that can resize/move panels on a grid-like basis? Like the AWS dashboard widgets.
Maybe: https://github.com/SortableJS/Sortable Can do this not sure.
-
Show HN: An open source visual editor for React
Well, there are obvious leading contenders like `https://sortablejs.github.io/Sortable/` and, within the `vue` space, `https://sortablejs.github.io/vue.draggable.next/`. Most of the stuff I looked at was unmaintained (lots not updated for vue3).
I really disliked the vuedraggable was handling nesting, and it's just a wrapper around a sortable. At the end of the day, my problem was simple enough that I didn't want a 500kb dependency. If you're wanting to do something like the OP but with nesting, I'd definitely start by looking at Sortable, though (maybe wrapping it the way you want).
- SortableJS: Library for reorderable drag-and-drop lists
-
Ruby on Rails #119 Trello Clone. Advanced Drag and Drop Sortable Lists with Hotwire
Have you looked into alternatives to SortableJS btw? It's a good library but it's also pretty big (43kb) based on https://github.com/SortableJS/Sortable/blob/master/Sortable.min.js.
- react sortable-js, two types of items and nested items
-
How to use Nodemailer with Cypress 10?
after(() => { cy.task('sendMail', 'This will be output to email address') .then(result => console.log(result)); }) //zadanie A it("navstiv stranku a vyhladaj a elementy v casti Framework Support", ()=>{ cy.visit('https://sortablejs.github.io/Sortable/#cloning')
-
Can anyone share an example of drag and drop content
Check out https://sortablejs.github.io/Sortable/
- How to create a Drag and Drop quiz like this?
-
Here's how I did in my first week of Frontend Mentor challenges.
💡 Note - This HTML, CSS and Javascript challenge will put your responsive layout skills and javascript skills to the test. If you want to take the extra test, I would personally advise looking at SortableJS for reorderable drag-and-drop lists.
lit
-
I've created yet another JavaScript framework
That is the reason why I experiment with the TiniJS framework for a while. It is a collection of tools for developing web/desktop/mobile apps using the native Web Component technology, based on the Lit library. Thank you the Lit team for creating a great tool assists us working with standard Web Component easier.
- Web Components e a minha opinião sobre o futuro das libs front-end
- Show HN: I made a Pinterest clone using SigLIP image embeddings
-
What We Need Instead of "Web Components"
actually, looking at it (https://lit.dev/), i do exactly that.
I also define a `render()` and extend my own parent, which does a `replaceChildren()` with the render. And, strangely, I also call the processor `html`
I'll still stick with mine however, my 'framework' is half-page of code. I dislike dependencies greatly. I'd need to be saving thousand+ lines at least.
Here, I don't want a build system to make a website; that's mad. So I don't want lit. I want the 5 lines it takes to invoke a dom parser, and the 5 lines it takes do define a webcomp parent.
-
Web Components Aren't Framework Components
I rather like https://lit.dev/ for web components so far.
For the reactivity stuff, you might want to read https://frontendmasters.com/blog/vanilla-javascript-reactivi... - it shows a bunch of no-library-required patterns that, while in a number of cases I'd much rather use a library myself, all seems at least -basically- reasonable to me and will probably be far more comprehensible to you than whatever I'd reach for, and frameworks are always much more pleasant to approach after you've already done a bunch of stuff by banging rocks together first.
- Reddit just completed their migration out of React
-
Web Components Eliminate JavaScript Framework Lock-In
I work on Lit, which I would hesitate to call a framework, but gives a framework-like DX for building web components, while trying to keep opinions to a minimum and lock-in as low as possible.
It's got reactivity, declarative templates, great performance, SSR, TypeScript support, native CSS encapsulation, context, tasks, and more.
It's used to build Material Design, settings and devtools UIs for Chrome, some UI for Firefox, Reddit, Photoshop Web...
https://lit.dev if you're interested.
-
HTML Web Components
I am more a fan of the augmented style because it doesn't entrap you in dev lock-in to platforms.
The problem with frameworks, especially web frameworks, is they reimplement many items that are standard now (shadowdom, components, storage, templating, base libraries, class/async, network/realtime etc).
If you like the component style of other frameworks but want to use Web Components, Google Lit is quite nice.
Google Lit is like a combination of HTML Web Components and React/Vue style components. The great part is it is build on Web Components underneath.
[1] https://lit.dev/
-
Web Components Will Outlive Your JavaScript Framework
From the comments I see here, it seems like people expect the Webcomponents API to be a complete replacement for a JS framework. The thing is, our frameworks should start making use of modern web APIs, so the frameworks will have to do less themselves, so can be smaller. Lit [0] for example is doing this. Using Lit is very similar to using React. Some things work different, and you have to get used to some web component specific things, but once you get it, I think it's way more pleasant to work with than React. It feels more natural, native, less framework-specific.
For state management, I created LitState [1], a tiny library (really only 258 lines), which integrates nicely with Lit, and which makes state management between multiple components very easy. It's much easier than the Redux/flux workflows found in React.
So my experience with this is that it's much nicer to work with, and that the libraries are way smaller.
[0] https://lit.dev/
- Lit – a small responsive CSS framework
What are some alternatives?
react-sortable-hoc - A set of higher-order components to turn any list into an animated, accessible and touch-friendly sortable list✌️
Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps
HTML5Sortable - VanillaJS sortable lists and grids using native HTML5 drag and drop API.
stencil - A toolchain for building scalable, enterprise-ready component systems on top of TypeScript and Web Component standards. Stencil components can be distributed natively to React, Angular, Vue, and traditional web developers from a single, framework-agnostic codebase.
dropzone - Dropzone is an easy to use drag'n'drop library. It supports image previews and shows nice progress bars.
Vue.js - This is the repo for Vue 2. For Vue 3, go to https://github.com/vuejs/core
react-beautiful-dnd - Beautiful and accessible drag and drop for lists with React
Angular - Deliver web apps with confidence 🚀
bootstrap-select - :rocket: The jQuery plugin that brings select elements into the 21st century with intuitive multiselection, searching, and much more.
htmx - </> htmx - high power tools for HTML
Vue.Draggable - Vue drag-and-drop component based on Sortable.js
Preact - ⚛️ Fast 3kB React alternative with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.