smart-contract-best-practices VS ethernaut

Then i delved into best practises (https://consensys.github.io/smart-contract-best-practices/) and patterns (https://fravoll.github.io/solidity-patterns/) to improve.

Search for solidity exploits on Google, useful one: https://consensys.github.io/smart-contract-best-practices/ there are a lot of possible exploits so deploying one by yourself without audits is a no-go imo

Consensys' Smart Contract Best Practices is a good start for security related stuff (super important because you'll be dealing with people's money in smart contracts) https://consensys.github.io/smart-contract-best-practices/

The first question which any auditing interview concerns is mostly regarding what is your preferred audit process? Answers could be subjective, but I like to follow the industry standard as in this ‘Solcurity Standard’ article by Rari-Capital along with the Consensys’ best practices set of guidelines which pave a path for a thorough audit process.

Security should always be a major priority when developing smart contracts. Millions of dollars are lost to hackers on what seems like a regular basis. As a Web3 developer, you need to continuously stay up to date on the latest security best practices.

Solidity basics and best practices

Smart Contracts Best Practices

- https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/ethernaut - do ALL the security oriented exercises

View on GitHub

In the following code snippet, we have 4 contracts: Sender, SenderWithRequire, SenderWithEmit and Receiver. Here, Receiver will play the King contract role.

You could contribute to Ethernaut, such as updating to Solidity 0.8: https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/ethernaut