slskd VS ASP.NET Core

If you're looking for an API, there's slskd which runs as a daemon and offers a REST API for searching and downloading.

There's even an example daemon that can give remote access, so you wouldn't even have to have Soulseek and Seeker on the same computer: https://github.com/slskd/slskd

It’s not cli, but you could try slskd in a container - it has a nice web interface.

Another option along similar lines: https://github.com/slskd/slskd

Hi, I just stumbled upon slskd (https://github.com/slskd/slskd), and I'm struggling to configure it. I've downloaded the binary and executed it with command line and it created a config file. It keeps saying the login and password are wrong no matter what i put there. Also I have no idea how it can open the web UI. I think I'mm missing many things. I appreciate the help.

I had a similar problem: I wanted to run a Soulseek client on my home server / NAS. I eventually opted for https://github.com/slskd/slskd which provides a web interface, even though Nicotine+ is superior. Let's hope either slskd improves or Nicotine+ gets a remote control option (it can already run headlessly, so I guess develop is in progress).

Saw a post over on /r/DataHoarder regarding SLSKD. Hadn't heard of it before. Anyone vouch for it?

And, if you prefer a self hosted web app, you'll like slskd.

This approach to organizing middleware enhances code readability, maintainability, and reusability. By following this encapsulation pattern, you're adhering to best practices in ASP.NET Core development, ensuring your application remains well-organized and scalable.

🌟.NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET 9 Preview 2 Discussion ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 Release Notes ➡️EF Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET Aspire preview 4 - .NET Aspire

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/50643

Even if you look at Microsoft’s by far most popular GitHub project, they’re still only half as big as SupaBase. If you believe “the SupaBase story”, SupaBase grew and became twice as large as Microsoft in 3 years. Below is their likes over time if you’re curious, together with a couple of additional “too good to be true” Silicon Valley projects.

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/10117

To achieve these objectives, we will take inspiration from ASP.NET Core Identity's PasswordHasher class. It incorporates a concept of hash versioning, allowing only the number of iterations to be modified.

yes I watched several courses, may be aim not getting clearly. but i worked with asp.net which uses http call and firebase cloud function also which uses socket connection, for socket connection its makes sense to use observable bcoz there streams of data we can observe once the connection establish ,but for http it need to be call every time.

As I'm not utilizing ASP.NET, despite its resource-intensive nature and occasional unpredictability, I prefer the cost-free option. I'm hesitant to invest in EPPlus or engage in trials, and moreover, I am more proficient with Interop. Given the limited volume of records in my department, there's a preference for utilizing tools covered by our existing license. This avoids the need for navigating through layers of approval within the chain of command and ensures compliance with our contractual agreements and Microsoft's patch management, ultimately aligning with a cost-saving mindset.