slonik VS docs

And sometimes invest instead in learning a technology rather than hide it: for example slonik encourages you to write normal SQL queries by making SQL templating easier and safer. In turn, your IDE would be able to understand those queries and give you support based on the database schemas you actually have.

I'd push you to consider using postgres, slonik or similar for database queries. With these libraries, you just write SQL, but they perform input sanitization for you. So you can safely write:

You can already use postgres with Slonik.

https://github.com/gajus/slonik#user-content-slonik-how-are-...

It is not going to be the default because it is way slower.

https://github.com/gajus/slonik/actions/runs/6616647651

Test node_version:18 test_only:postgres-integration is taking 3 minutes.

Test node_version:18 test_only:pg-integration is taking 38 seconds.

For those uninitiated, Slonik is a battle-tested SQL query building and execution library for Node.js. Its primary goal is to allow you to write and compose SQL queries in a safe and convenient way. Now, let's see how it pairs with Express.js.

I am the maintainer of Slonik and I am trying to understand what portion of this sub-users are using Slonik vs other libraries, and if they are using anything else – what are their reasons for it.

It's nice that they implemented string templates essentially exactly the same way Javascript template literals and tag functions work. They even give an example of using it to create a prepared statement (e.g. DB."SELECT * FROM foo WHERE bar = \{inputParam}") which is exactly what many NodeJS libraries due, e.g. Slonik https://github.com/gajus/slonik, like sql`SELECT * FROM foo WHERE bar = ${inputParam}`;

I've found libraries like Zod useful when interacting with external data sources like a database. Slonik[1] uses Zod to define the types expected from a SQL query and then performs runtime validation on the data to ensure that the query is yielding the expected type.

I don't think it's necessary to use Zod/runtime validation everywhere, but it's a nice tool to have on hand.

[1]https://github.com/gajus/slonik

Demonstrate how easily and accidentally one can make an SQL injection with these:

https://github.com/porsager/postgres

https://github.com/gajus/slonik

Have you tried Slonik (https://github.com/gajus/slonik)? It won't generate types from queries automatically, but it encourages writing SQL vs. a query builder and allows type annotations of queries with Zod. Query results are validated at runtime to ensure the queries are typed correctly.

The syntax plugins for Prisma ORM auto-format their schema files in a similar way [1]. It bothers me so much that I can't bring myself to use their solution - which I realise is incredibly petty :)

[1] https://github.com/prisma/docs/blob/main/content/200-concept...

https://github.com/prisma/docs/issues/1652 It's almost as if when you're biased, you only find what you are looking for.

Ha, thanks a lot for catching this, just fixed it ✅

That's fair! I'm actually with you that proper documentation contributes a lot to a positive developer experience and while it seems like a detail, I totally understand how this feels off putting! I've created an issue for this forwarded it to our docs team to get this fixed very soon. Thanks again for reporting!

What exactly do you mean with a bulk API? As of now, Prisma provides updateMany and deleteMany operations. There's also the $transaction method which you can use for bulk creates and other bulk operations (plus we're also working on extending the Prisma Client API, e.g. with `createMany operations).