SLF4J
cats
Our great sponsors
SLF4J | cats | |
---|---|---|
23 | 22 | |
2,257 | 1,091 | |
1.1% | 3.4% | |
7.8 | 9.7 | |
13 days ago | about 23 hours ago | |
Java | Java | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
SLF4J
- Slf4j.org TLS Certificate Expired
-
dazl — a facade for configurable/pluggable Go logging
A few years ago, my team moved from Java to Go. Working on Go projects, we encountered a wide variety of logging frameworks with different APIs, configuration, and formatting. We soon found ourselves longing for a logging abstraction layer like Java’s slf4j, which had proven invaluable for use in reusable libraries or configuring and debugging production systems. So, not long after moving to Go, we began working toward replacing what we had lost in slf4j.
-
Fargate logging thru console awslogs or directly to Cloudwatch?
I'm not familiar with Serilog as I code mostly in Java, use slf4j (logs to stdout) and our apps send logs to Cloudwatch using the task definition's awslogs configuration. I prefer it this way because I can customize the log configurations in my task definitions. Also the default stream name has this format prefix-name/container-name/ecs-task-id so I can easily identify the logs of the task I want to look at. I haven't experienced any downsides with this approach and our apps publish a shit ton of logs. Cloudwatch approach looks like you can customize the stream name?
-
How does Loggers get multiple parameters in functions
slf4j is open source. You can look at the code.
-
Logging in your API
Java -> Logback, Log4j2, JDK (Java Util Logging), Slf4j, e.t.c.
-
Primeiros passos no desenvolvimento Java em 2023: um guia particular
slf4j para padronização dos logs;
- What are some of the biggest problems you personally face in Java?
-
must known frameworks/libs/tech, every senior java developer must know(?)
SLF4J
-
Go standard library: structured, leveled logging
> My God. Logging in protobuf?
Yes, or any other data format and/or transport protocol.
I'm surprised this is up for debate.
> Logging is the lowest of all debugging utilities - its the first thing you ever do writing software - “hello world”. And, while I admire structural logging, the truth is printing strings remains (truly) the lowest common denominator across software developers.
This sort of comment is terribly miopic. You can have a logging API, and then configure your logging to transport the events anywhere, any way. This is a terribly basic feature and requirement, and one that comes out of the box with some systems. Check how SLF4J[1] is pervasive in Java, and how any SLF4J implementation offers logging to stdout or a local file as a very specific and basic usecase.
It turns out that nowadays most developers write software that runs on many computers that aren't stashed over or under their desks, and thus they need efficient and convenient ways to check what's happening either in a node or in all deployments.
[1] https://www.slf4j.org/
- Logback en Springboot
cats
- Ask HN: What Underrated Open Source Project Deserves More Recognition?
- Yet Another REST API Fuzzer
-
CWE Top Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses
Out of this frustration I've built: https://github.com/Endava/cats. It's for APIs, but mostly addressing exactly this case: don't use strings for everything, if you choose to use it though, make sure you add patterns for checking if things are valid, make sure you think about all the corner cases and all the weird characters that can brake you app, and so on.
-
API Security Testing
If the API has an OpenAPI spec available, you can use: https://github.com/Endava/cats
-
Cucumber Maintainer out of Job and future of the project is uncertain
This is why we need better tools which will give benefits for the added complexity. If you need to create both the feature files AND the code, it's just complexity with little benefits. But frameworks like https://github.com/karatelabs/karate or https://github.com/Endava/cats are hiding this complexity and remove the code layer entirely. Which, in my view, this is where you need to be in 2023, particularly for API testing.
-
Invisible Characters
I've built a tool specifically to test if these kind of characters will reach API backends: https://github.com/Endava/cats. My idea was that APIs should explicitly reject or sanitise input containing such characters.
- REST API fuzzer with minimum configuration
- Learnings from 5 Years of Tech Startup Code Audits
-
ce framework pentru fuzzing folositi ?
Cats by Endava
- am creat un web server in C imun la buffer overflows
What are some alternatives?
Apache Log4j 2 - Apache Log4j 2 is a versatile, feature-rich, efficient logging API and backend for Java.
openapi-fuzzer - Black-box fuzzer that fuzzes APIs based on OpenAPI specification. Find bugs for free!
Logbook - An extensible Java library for HTTP request and response logging
restler-fuzzer - RESTler is the first stateful REST API fuzzing tool for automatically testing cloud services through their REST APIs and finding security and reliability bugs in these services.
tinylog - tinylog is a lightweight logging framework for Java, Kotlin, Scala, and Android
mimic - [ab]using Unicode to create tragedy
kibana - Your window into the Elastic Stack
RESTest - RESTest: Automated Black-Box Testing of RESTful Web APIs
graylog - Free and open log management
mitmproxy2swagger - Automagically reverse-engineer REST APIs via capturing traffic
Logback - The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.
jcrapi2 - A Java Wrapper For Official Supercell Clash Royal Api