size-limit VS emotion

However, you can use the Size Limit library to control the size of a bundle or individual exports. Here’s an example configuration:

It's always good to keep track of these things over time so performance doesn't slide. Parcel, which I used for this project, has a helpful bundle analyzer (similar to the one for Webpack) that gives a nice visual overview of a project's bundle. This is especially helpful for identifying bundled dead code coming from packages that could be avoided with tree-shaking. There are also plenty of tools you can integrate with CI to enforce bundle size.

TSDX is a great package for npm packages like this and even bundles with size-limit to check your gzipped final bundle size. Keeping a tiny package was really important to me so there are 0 dependencies and size-limit made me realise that simplifying all of my checking functions into 1 or 2 core functions that took options would be a better strategy and help reduce the code size.

Small. 130 bytes (minified and gzipped). No dependencies Size Limit controls the size.

Size Limit is a performance budget tool for JavaScript. It checks every commit on CI, calculates the real cost of your JS for end-users, and throws an error if the cost exceeds the limit. Link: https://github.com/ai/size-limit

-Mark Erikson and Joel Hooks talk on Redux -When and when not to reach for Redux -Redux Introduction -Egghead course by Dan Abramov on Fundamentals of Redux -RDD article by Tom Preston Werner -Another Article on RDD -Article on writing a great Readme -RDD Readme Example: size-limit

emotion [ https://emotion.sh ]

dang, I never thought about this implication, and I googled the emotionjs repo there's a currently-active open issue regarding this https://github.com/emotion-js/emotion/issues/2928

Over my years of working with React, I’ve loved using CSS-in-JS libraries like Emotion and Styled-components. However, their inherent performance overhead from injecting CSS at runtime and their incompatibility with the latest Next.js features such as App Router and React Server Components (RSC) have always been a nagging issue for me.

An early difficulty I encountered was using UI component libraries like Mantine and Material UI in the new architecture. After looking through some GitHub issues, the culprit is Emotion, a package many component libraries rely on that does not support server rendering.

In general I recommend using styled-components or emotion. These directly attach CSS to your components in a scoped way so that your CSS files aren’t stepping on each other’s toes all the time and make sure styling is colocated with the component.

I ran into this problem as well. The root cause as I understand it is emotion: https://github.com/emotion-js/emotion/issues/2928

While integrating component libraries, they may not give you full control over the order in which styles are inserted. (Example issue).

Vanilla Extract (CSS Framework) (Alternative: Emotion)