SimpleMDE VS openzeppelin-contracts

can be a little fiddly depending on your needs, but this is what we use https://simplemde.com/

You can also use drop-in JS components. I have a home-grown CMS that includes SimpleMDE (https://simplemde.com/), a markdown editor. SimpleMDE syncs its contents to the DOM, so from HTMX's perspective, it's just another text field and can be submitted along with a regular form POST.

hardhat - Ethereum development environment web3modal - An easy-to-use library that allows users to connect their wallets to your app react-markdown and simplemde - Markdown editor and markdown renderer for the CMS @emotion/css - A great CSS in JS library @openzeppelin/contracts - Open source implementations of useful smart contract standards and functionality

Check out this Markdown editor, made using SimpleMDE.

To do so, we will use a javascript markdown editor called SimpleMDE. This is quite an elegant solution as this library will target our textarea and replace them, which mean that our solution will still work if one of our users has javascript disabled on its browser (who does that?).

There is a lot of awesome JavaScript markdown editors but I settled for simpleMDE as a very easy embeddable Markdown Editor.

Lets look the events of Open Zeppelin’s ERC20 token contract:

ERC-777 is difficult to implement properly, due to its susceptibility to different forms of attack(opens in a new tab). It is recommended to use ERC-20 instead. This page remains as a historical archive.

This depends if you're writing a contract from scratch or using existing code. If you're making something new, then yes (recommend not to use THE most recent available, always better to go with tried and tested). For existing projects, never try to override the solidity version. This may be a pain with "@" imports - ideally everyone should specify the library version (e.g. https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/v2.5.1/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol).