silveroak VS practical-fm

Compare silveroak vs practical-fm and see what are their differences.


Formal specification and verification of hardware, especially for security and privacy. (by project-oak)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
silveroak practical-fm
3 4
97 456
- -
7.3 4.1
almost 2 years ago 25 days ago
Apache License 2.0 -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.


Posts with mentions or reviews of silveroak. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-23.


Posts with mentions or reviews of practical-fm. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-09-14.
  • We Need Simpler Types (speculations on what can be improved in future type systems and on erasing the boundaries between types and values)
    2 projects | /r/ProgrammingLanguages | 14 Sep 2022 Look for Coq, Agda, Idris, MS - F*.
  • Formal Verification Methods in industry
    4 projects | /r/compsci | 31 Jan 2022
    When you say "formal verification methods", what kind of techniques are you interested in? While using interactive theorem provers will most likely not become very widespread, there are plenty of tools that use formal techniques to give more correctness guarantees. These tools might give some guarantees, but do not guarantee complete functional correctness. WireGuard (VPN tunnel) is I think a very interesting application where they verified the protocol. There are also some tools in use, e.g. Mythril and CrossHair, that focus on detecting bugs using symbolic execution. There's also INFER from Facebook/Meta which tries to verify memory safety automatically. The following GitHub repo might also interest you, it lists some companies that use formal methods: practical-fm

What are some alternatives?

When comparing silveroak and practical-fm you can also consider the following projects:

magmide - A dependently-typed proof language intended to make provably correct bare metal code possible for working software engineers.

koika - A core language for rule-based hardware design 🦑

ouroboros-high-assurance - High-assurance implementation of the Ouroboros protocol family

CommunityModules - TLA+ snippets, operators, and modules contributed and curated by the TLA+ community

hacl-star - HACL*, a formally verified cryptographic library written in F*

vericert - A formally verified high-level synthesis tool based on CompCert and written in Coq.

hacspec - Please see

timewinder - Temporal Logic of Actions in Rust via Starlark

saw-script - The SAW scripting language.

kami - A Platform for High-Level Parametric Hardware Specification and its Modular Verification

crucible - Crucible is a library for symbolic simulation of imperative programs

CrossHair - An analysis tool for Python that blurs the line between testing and type systems.