signal-temporal-logic
DISCONTINUED
include-what-you-use
Our great sponsors
signal-temporal-logic | include-what-you-use | |
---|---|---|
1 | 39 | |
30 | 3,771 | |
- | 1.9% | |
0.0 | 9.4 | |
6 months ago | 4 days ago | |
C++ | C++ | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
signal-temporal-logic
include-what-you-use
-
Speed Up C++ Compilation
Build Insights in Visual Studio, include-what-you-use).
Looks like https://include-what-you-use.org/ might do that.
-
Is it good or bad practice to include headers that are indirectly included from other headers?
If you are worried about includes, use https://github.com/include-what-you-use/include-what-you-use and stop thinking about it.
Take a look at https://include-what-you-use.org/ . It sorts out the issue of what to include and where.
-
how do you guys manage a include file mess ?
Getting rid of that is not straightforard, though some tools can help with that
I just recently heard of a tool Include What You Use that is an automation tool to help determine which include files you need and doesn't include files you dont.
-
Is it appropiate to comment what a header is needed for?
You can use the tool https://github.com/include-what-you-use/include-what-you-use to do this for for. It tracks included files and can give comment for what is used from each file. It also warns you when you include files that you don’t use
-
Hey Rustaceans! Got a question? Ask here (16/2023)!
Invisible imports (e.g. traits). In Python, everything is fully namespaced (unless you from import * in which case all bets are off). It's always explicit where a name is coming from. C is the opposite: #include lets you refer to anything defined in the headers with no namespacing. That's why a common strategy (include what you use) has an associated code style: after every non-std #include you have a comment saying which of its definitions you are using. Of course, Rust is much less implicit, but I still sometimes struggle with traits. For example, you can use tokio::net::TcpStream, but you need to also use tokio::io::AsyncReadExt for the .read trait to be defined on TcpStream. This makes it hard (for me) to answer questions like "what traits are currently available in this scope?" and "why is this module being imported?"
- I implemented a NASA image compression algorithm
-
IncludeGuardian - improve build times by removing expensive includes
Aside from being closed source and not available on all architectures, how does it compare to iwyu(https://include-what-you-use.org/) or clang's relatively recent include-fixer which is also accessible via clangd?
IWYU will look at the content of your sources and highlight include directives that it believes are unnecessary (and vice versa, recommend including files that you transitively depend on).
What are some alternatives?
cppinclude - Tool for analyzing includes in C++
coc-clangd - clangd extension for coc.nvim
cpplint - Static code checker for C++
clangd - clangd language server
Cppcheck - static analysis of C/C++ code
uncrustify - Code beautifier
pre-commit - A framework for managing and maintaining multi-language pre-commit hooks.
cmake-lint - Fork of https://github.com/richq/cmake-lint to continue maintenance
entt - Gaming meets modern C++ - a fast and reliable entity component system (ECS) and much more
STL - MSVC's implementation of the C++ Standard Library.
OCLint - A static source code analysis tool to improve quality and reduce defects for C, C++ and Objective-C
pre-commit-hooks - C/C++ hooks to integrate with pre-commit