shake
Shake build system (by ndmitchell)
coreutils
Cross-platform Rust rewrite of the GNU coreutils (by uutils)
Our great sponsors
| shake | coreutils | |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 119 | |
| 755 | 16,822 | |
| - | 1.6% | |
| 6.7 | 10.0 | |
| 3 months ago | about 17 hours ago | |
| Haskell | Rust | |
| BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
shake
Posts with mentions or reviews of shake.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-11-05.
-
Ninja is enough build system
Another interesting implementation is Shake: https://shakebuild.com/
It is technically a Haskell DSL, but supports Ninja files, time estimates and has tools for linting and profiling.
-
Buck2: Our open source build system
They explicitly refer to Shake build system and Build Systems a la Carte paper.
-
Straightforward Makefile Tutorial that bring together best practices once and for all.
The one paper that gave me hope about build systems was Build systems à la carte: Theory and practice, by Andrey Mokhov, Neil Mitchell, and Simon Peyton Jones. Among other things, it describes the theoretical underpinnings of the Shake build system. To be honest I believe any build system that ignores the maths described in this paper can safely be ignored. (You may however ignore the paper itself if the maths checks out. See Daniel J. Bernstein's redo, which matches Shake very closely.)
-
Worst language you ever used? Really used not just looked at the manual.
Yeah, they don't have to be terrible. I haven't used it, but people in my circles tend to really like Shake, which uses a Haskell embedded DSL to describe builds.
- Shake Build System
-
Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats facing the GNU Autotools
You could try Shake. It's a sane build system written by a former co-worker of mine. https://shakebuild.com/
-
Overview of the CMake controversy, and break down the pros and cons of the critical C++ tool.
Shake does require compilation as it's essentially just a Haskell library providing a DSL and it works just fine, I guess in gradle's case it's a thing about Java-typical overengineering and complete blindness to resource usage. Shake's underlying engine can actually go head-to-head with ninja itself when building ninja files.
-
Need recommendations for a dependency-tracking system
Did you look at shake: https://shakebuild.com/ ?
- The Shake Build System
-
Trouble Linking Dynamic Library for Package
For reasons I don't want to get into, I am building my own GHC package without cabal. The documentation is a little sketchy, but I've succeeded in build and installing it in my own user database (I'm on linux x86_64, using GHC 8.6.5). I am using shake to do all of this, and I've been pretty pleased with how it works.
coreutils
Posts with mentions or reviews of coreutils.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-01-02.
-
Cross-platform Rust rewrite of the GNU coreutils
Not that it should represent the rubicon of when to/not to rewrite code, but when you do, you do trade one set of bugs for a new set of bugs: https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/issues
-
The First Stable Release of a Rust-Rewrite Sudo Implementation
Would be interesting to see a a Debian derivative that combines this with the Rust Implementation Of GNU Coreutils.[1] Could be a big win for memory safety and performance.
- New Version of the Rust Coreutils
- best software for linux
-
Looking for a small boring rust project to help my learning.
uutils /coreutils is also a great project. It has many contributors, and it also is a great resource to learn.
-
I Built an Implementation of the ls Command to Learn Rust! (Used to List Files in the Terminal)
You might be interested in this? https://github.com/uutils/coreutils
-
I have years of experience in vulnerability analysis including several 0-day discovery, and this bug [buffer overflow] seems totally safe.
Already did it. Checkmate, as i believe your people say.
-
[Media] My Rust OS for microcontrollers now has a dir command
There is already a rust implementation of coreutiils that uses a single binary like BusyBox or toybox. https://github.com/uutils/coreutils
- Tree(1) in Zig
-
Rust is ugly, doesn’t even let you write simple data structures, unsafe rust is not even defined, makes the simplest things so hard to write and did I mention it’s ugly?
Ah yes, std, that famous crate that is unusable for systems programming. God forbid anyone do any "systems" programming that uses std.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing shake and coreutils you can also consider the following projects:
gitHUD - command-line HUD for your git repo
exa - A modern replacement for ‘ls’.
marvin - The paranoid bot (framework)
tokei - Count your code, quickly.
shake-language-c - Cross-compilation framework based on the Shake Haskell library.
watchexec - Executes commands in response to file modifications
leksah - Haskell IDE
woodpecker - Drill is an HTTP load testing application written in Rust
bumper - Haskell tool to automatically bump package versions transitively.
skim - Fuzzy Finder in rust!
clone-all - clone all the github repositories of a particular user.
rust - Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.