sexp-grammar VS coq-serapi

Compare sexp-grammar vs coq-serapi and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
sexp-grammar coq-serapi
- 1
31 122
- -
4.7 8.1
5 months ago 11 days ago
Haskell OCaml
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

sexp-grammar

Posts with mentions or reviews of sexp-grammar. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning sexp-grammar yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

coq-serapi

Posts with mentions or reviews of coq-serapi. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Translating My Z3 Tutorial to Coq
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 27 Feb 2021
    It's a question I hadn't really considered before. On first pass, as far as I know, I'd say the answer is no. It isn't clear to me what the objective of embedding Coq with a C api for example would be. The very core of Coq is about verifying proofs and not producing them and I'm not sure what the benefit of embedding it is.

    Having said that there are a few projects that may be something like what you're asking. First off, Coq has the SerAPI project https://github.com/ejgallego/coq-serapi through which external programs can talk to coq. This has been used for example to make a python OpenAi gym like interface https://github.com/princeton-vl/CoqGym.

    A different direction might be something like MetaMath Zero https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10703 which is intended to be a small and fast verifier for it's language, perhaps maybe someday for embedding in applications. There is this notion of "Proof Carrying Code" which I don't really know what the current state of the art is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof-carrying_code One might want an easily embeddable trusted verifier for that purpose. I don't know.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing sexp-grammar and coq-serapi you can also consider the following projects:

sexp

coq - Coq is a formal proof management system. It provides a formal language to write mathematical definitions, executable algorithms and theorems together with an environment for semi-interactive development of machine-checked proofs.

xeno - Fast Haskell XML parser

bs-json - Compositional JSON encode/decode library for BuckleScript

Ceras - Universal binary serializer for a wide variety of scenarios https://discord.gg/FGaCX4c

Coqtail - Interactive Coq Proofs in Vim