semantic-rs
Rust Language Server
Our great sponsors
semantic-rs | Rust Language Server | |
---|---|---|
1 | 6 | |
163 | 3,568 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 7.0 | |
- | over 1 year ago | |
Rust | Rust | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
semantic-rs
-
Is `semantic-rs` maintained in a fork somewhere? Alternatives
I've been looking for useful crates on the Rust Awesome list and came across semantic-rs, which looked really useful. Unfortunately, the repository is archived and last release is from 2018.
Rust Language Server
-
Why doesn't rust-analyzer reuse infrastructures of rustc?
In the last there was RLS that did exactly that. But the approach of rust-analyzer was found to be more performant.
-
[RFC] Generate Cabal files from TOML
LSP support seems to be lacking as well, at least rust doesn't seem to have Cargo.toml support? https://github.com/rust-lang/rls/issues/785
-
Referencing files in subfolders and difference between borrowing and C like references
apparently, it means that you're using the old RLS-based Rust plugin for VS Code, rather than the rust-analyzer plugin. You probably won't see a lot of people familiar with RLS's error messages.
-
friendly reminder for our vscode folks, use rust-analyzer
Why: The rust-analyzer extension integrates with rust-analyzer, an alternative language server for Rust. rust-analyzer tends to perform better and get less confused with your code as compared to RLS, which the Rust extension uses.
-
Show HN: Skruv – No-dependency, no-build, small JavaScript framework
I have tried writing websites with rust instead of JavaScript. Unfortunately, the tooling is just not there. More specifically, I am talking about wasm-bindgen, which provides two-way bindings. The problem with it is that since all the declarations are generated with build.rs, there is no autocompletion. Since I am spoiled by modern tooling, no autocompletion to me means not feasible pass demo stage. (https://github.com/rust-lang/rls/issues/1489)
Aside from the lack of autocompletion, passing rust closures to js land (DOM) is extremely janky as well. However, that might be caused by my lack of experience with rust.
(If you are curious, this is what I made: https://github.com/SCLeoX/non-grid-path-finder)
-
José Valim The Creator Of The Elixir Programming
Python the core devs don't care about tooling and they have IDE's, Java is an enterprise monolith so IDE's are the standard, Rust yes it is (https://github.com/rust-lang/rls), Elm I have no idea I don't use it.
What are some alternatives?
neon - Rust bindings for writing safe and fast native Node.js modules.
Rustup - The Rust toolchain installer
emacs-ycmd - Emacs client for ycmd, the code completion system.
Racer - Rust Code Completion utility
stainless - Organized, flexible testing framework for Rust
rusty-tags - Create ctags/etags for a cargo project
rust-analyzer - A Rust compiler front-end for IDEs
xargo - The sysroot manager that lets you build and customize `std`
Clippy - A bunch of lints to catch common mistakes and improve your Rust code. Book: https://doc.rust-lang.org/clippy/
tarpaulin - A code coverage tool for Rust projects
artifact - The open source design documentation tool for everybody