Selenium WebDriver VS Poltergeist

Compare Selenium WebDriver vs Poltergeist and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Selenium WebDriver Poltergeist
63 2
29,245 2,546
1.2% -
9.9 0.0
7 days ago about 5 years ago
Java Ruby
Apache License 2.0 MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Selenium WebDriver

Posts with mentions or reviews of Selenium WebDriver. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-03.

Poltergeist

Posts with mentions or reviews of Poltergeist. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-10-04.
  • Stripe Financial Connections
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 4 May 2022
    Hostile integrations using scripts to obtain financial data is trivial. Frameworks such as:

    https://github.com/teampoltergeist/poltergeist

    is an excellent example of such a framework. Implementing "bank drivers" using such frameworks would not be difficult.

    Plaid and others seem to have done an awesome job scaling the hostile integration pattern. However, the idea that Stripe decided to build this in-house rather than rely on Plaid is perfectly reasonable.

    After all, the tools to implement such a product are well known.

  • Migrating Selenium system tests to Cuprite
    10 projects | dev.to | 4 Oct 2021
    In our project, we’ve been running system tests (then called rather "Feature tests") since around 2016. System tests use a real browser in the background and test all layers of a Rails application at once: from the database all the way up to the nuances of JavaScript loaded together with the web pages. Back then, we wrote our system tests using Capybara with Poltergeist, a driver that ran a headless Phantom JS browser. Since this browser stopped being actively developed, we migrated our test suite to the Selenium / Webdriver wrapper around Chrome browser around ~2018. Chrome was itself fine for tests automation but the Selenium API was quite limited and we had to rewrite several Poltergeist features using 3rd party gems and tools.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Selenium WebDriver and Poltergeist you can also consider the following projects:

metamask-extension - :globe_with_meridians: :electric_plug: The MetaMask browser extension enables browsing Ethereum blockchain enabled websites

Watir - Watir Powered By Selenium

PyAutoGUI - A cross-platform GUI automation Python module for human beings. Used to programmatically control the mouse & keyboard.

capybara-webkit

splinter - splinter - python test framework for web applications

Fix - Specing framework.

Selenium Wire - Extends Selenium's Python bindings to give you the ability to inspect requests made by the browser.

API Taster - A quick and easy way to visually test your Rails application's API.

locust - Write scalable load tests in plain Python 🚗💨

TapReportParser - TAP Report Parser

Playwright - Playwright is a framework for Web Testing and Automation. It allows testing Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API.

cuprite - Headless Chrome/Chromium driver for Capybara