Shaarli VS zim-wiki

I think about rate-limiting from an unprivileged user perspective and saw it first at https://github.com/sebsauvage/Shaarli/blob/master/index.php#.... So e.g. fail2ban is not an option. And the application has to deal with it.

I care more about load/DOS than actual crack success. What means the firewall is the sensible place. Not the application.

Or just take the risk, make backup/restore simple and do intrusion detection by monitoring a dedicated endpoint with e.g. https://updown.io/44q5 and let things happen for the sake of simplicity.

Hm. (I'm doing a federated, single-user microblog engine targeting laypersons. A proof of concept is at https://codeberg.org/mro/ShaarliGo)

Funny you should mention!

I'm not much of a programmer or designer at all, but probably my most popular thing is the "EightFiveZero" theme I made for Zim, which the author of Zim linked to from the wiki and makes me almost feel like a real programmer or something.

https://github.com/jaap-karssenberg/zim-wiki/wiki/Templates

Ahah, I found the tables! You have to go into Zim's settings and enable them as an addon in there. Ty, I thought there was no support whatsoever (other than putting pictures of tables in https://github.com/jaap-karssenberg/zim-wiki/wiki/Create-a-t... ).

Indeed it still seems a bit limited. Nothing like Firefox's in-built table editor used to be (this is the one in Thunderbird, which is quite nice). I wish they hadn't removed that feature :|

Treesheets is a beautiful program, but I'm too much of a pen-and-paper + plaintext notes person to appreciate it properly.