warp
Cargo
warp | Cargo | |
---|---|---|
66 | 280 | |
9,920 | 13,773 | |
0.4% | 1.5% | |
5.9 | 9.9 | |
11 months ago | 2 days ago | |
Rust | Rust | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
warp
-
Hyper – A fast and correct HTTP implementation for Rust
I tried warp [0] and I am unimpressed so far. Pretty complex, limited documentation, buggy. The builder paradigm they used feels pretty constrained and, in my opinion, achieve the opposite of the simplicity it is supposed to bring. I was surprised it is so popular.
Maybe I need more time or a favorable comparison to another framework to appreciate it.
[0] https://github.com/seanmonstar/warp
-
How in hell can Warp be considered "super easy"?
Have you gone through the (examples)[https://github.com/seanmonstar/warp/blob/master/examples/]? There's actually a lot of explicit instructions here on how to use Warp, and all of them are very straightforward to read (e.g., (this example with route parameters and a POST'ed body)[https://github.com/seanmonstar/warp/blob/master/examples/body.rs])
-
Custom Warp error messages
There are numerous guides how to do custom error messages using the routes .recover() method (including the official one ), but it seems quite inflexible since I can't (seem to?) pass the actual error messages back to user.
- Rendering a Rust project's file dependency tree in the terminal
-
Is there a more practical way to let warp respond to incoming requests?
What I see on the examples for the warp crate is that the examples do this:
-
I turned The Rust Book into a crate
You might want to consider using Alacritty instead of Warp. Warp is VC-funded, macOS only, closed source, and it phones home. They also kinda stole the name of a web framework.
-
I made rust-webapp-template
warp server,
-
Help with warp routes
Hello, I'd need some help with warp routes since I'm not familiar with the framework. If somebody knows how to do this I'd appreciate very much.
-
Any Rust based forum software?
If one were to undertake a project of developing something like this, which is the best web framework for it. I did some cursory research and discovered these back-end frameworks - actix, axum, poem, salvo, warp, gotham and rocket.
-
shuttle v0.7.1 has been released (improved isolation, new supported frameworks, QOL improvements)
We've added support for the warp, salvo & thruster frameworks
Cargo
-
Rust Cargo: The Backbone of Rust Development
https://www.rust-lang.org/ https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/ https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/getting-started/installation.html
-
Why We Chose Rust For Spin
cargo, rustfmt, clippy, rust-analyzer, and Rust’s robust unit testing capabilities together form a powerful ecosystem for managing large-scale projects like Spin.
-
Why doesn't Rust care more about compiler performance?
That work is being tracked in https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/5931
Someone has taken up the work on this though there are some foundational steps first.
1. We need to delineate intermediate and final build artifacts so people have a clearer understanding in `target/` what has stability guarantees (implemented, awaiting stabilization).
2. We then need to re-organize the target directory from being organized by file type to being organized by crate instance.
3. We need to re-do the file locking for `target/` so when we share things, one cargo process won't lock out your entire system
4. We can then start exploring moving intermediate artifacts into a central location.
There are some caveats to this initial implementation
- To avoid cache poisoning, this will only items with immutable source that and an idempotent build, leaving out your local source and stuff that depends on build scripts and proc-macros. There is work to reduce the reliance on build scripts and proc-macros. We may also need a "trust me, this is idempotent" flag for some remaining cases.
- A new instance of a crate will be created in the cache if any dependency changes versions, reducing reuse. This becomes worse when foundation crates release frequently and when adding or updating a specific dependency, Cargo prefers to keep all existing versions, creating a very unpredictable dependency tree. Support for remote caches, especially if you can use your project's CI as a cache source, would help a lot with this.
-
Reducing Cargo target directory size with -Zno-embed-metadata
> It seems wild to consider such intermediate files as part of public API. Someone relying on it does not automatically make it a breaking change if it’s not documented.
To find what is considered an intermediate vs a final artifact from cargo, you need to check out https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/build-cache.html
We are working on making this clearer with https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/14125 where there will be `build.build-dir` (intermediate files) and `build.target-dir` (final artifacts).
When you do a `cargo build` inside of a library, like `clap`, you will get an rlip copied into `build.target-dir` (final artifacts). This is intended for integration with other build systems. There are holes with this workflow though but identifying all of the relevant cases for what might be a "safe" breakage is difficult.
-
Malware found on NPM infecting local package with reverse shell
See https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/13897 and https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/13897#issuecomment... .
-
Exploring Rust: A Rubyist's Perspective
Powerful tooling: Cargo simplifies dependency management, builds, and testing.
-
Fish 4.0.0
What I mean is that in open source, things only get done by people motivated to do them. Nobody has ever even asked for darcs support: https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20sta...
So the lack of darcs isn’t because the Cargo folks think it’s bad or something. Just that things don’t get added just because.
Re quirks, sure, that’s why rustc and cargo are different. You don’t have to use Cargo. Meta does not, the Linux kernel does not.
-
Making your own PR to the SurrealDB source code
One of the reasons why user PRs are so frequent is that Rust itself is a pretty straightforward language to contribute to. While the language itself is on the complex side (to say the least), its strict compiler and single package manager make it relatively manageable to run and test any changes and to be confident that what you've submitted will work as expected.
- Rust registry error "candidate versions found which didn't match"
-
Fish 4.0: The Fish of Theseus
> That’s because, while cargo is great at building things, it is very simplistic at installing them. Cargo wants everything in a few neat binaries, and that isn’t our use case. Fish has about 1200 .fish scripts (961 completions, 217 associated functions), as well as about 130 pages of documentation (as html and man pages), and the web-config tool and the man page generator (both written in python).
Our issue for this is https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/2729
Personally, I lean away from Cargo expanding into these use cases and prefer another tool being implemented on top. I've written more about this at https://epage.github.io/blog/2023/08/are-we-gui-build-yet/
What are some alternatives?
axum - Ergonomic and modular web framework built with Tokio, Tower, and Hyper
RustCMake - An example project showing usage of CMake with Rust
actix-web - Actix Web is a powerful, pragmatic, and extremely fast web framework for Rust.
cargo-check
hyperterm - A terminal built on web technologies
overflower - A Rust compiler plugin and support library to annotate overflow behavior