Scully VS Nuxt.js

In recent years, projects like Vercel's NextJS and Gatsby have garnered acclaim and higher and higher usage numbers. Not only that, but their core concepts of Server Side Rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG) have been seen in other projects and frameworks such as Angular Universal, ScullyIO, and NuxtJS. Why is that? What is SSR and SSG? How can I use these concepts in my applications?

I just spent like 4 hours trying to resolve some dependencies in my angular project so I can install skully - a static site generator in my angular project. And I am exhausted.

There are several solutions to get around the routing issue. One is to use MPA's (multi page applications). Both Angular (Angular Universal, Scully, and more recently released Analog) and React (NextJs and Remix) have meta-frameworks that provide a server side rendered solution.

Unfortunately, there are no options that I know of. There is a new meta-framework for Angular called Analog but it is not yet ready for SSR. If you need SSG, there is Scully. Other than that, you will have to wait for the Angular Team to fix their Universal project or switch to one of the meta-frameworks :)

Make sure to checkout the Scully Docs.

As for Angular, there's the official @angular/universal package, but I wasn't a fan of it the last time I used it. I've used Scully before and it worked great, plus it requires no changes to your code, unlike Universal.

Scully, static site generation

Take a look at Scully. It’s a static site generator for Angular apps.

Maybe take a look at this: https://scully.io/

According to Node Package Manager (NPM), Next.js has about 3.9 million weekly downloads while Nuxt.js has about 438,000. Although Next.js has a significantly higher number of weekly downloads, Nuxt.js still has a robust number of users. We can conclude that both frameworks are relevant and will stand the test of time.

Nuxt team themselves pointed that out [in first release](https://www.npmjs.com/package/nuxt/v/0.0.1) as well as you can see that statement in [Nuxt's wikipedia article](https://cdn.domin.pro/K2Qa). I completely agree with how Nuxt is better for an amount of features.

Node is basically back-end Javascript. While powerful alone, almost exclusively you will use a back-end framework like Next.js or Gatsby when using React, and then maybe Nuxt or Gridsome in Vue.

Both Vue.js and React have their own set of tools and libraries to help developers build and maintain their applications. Vue.js has Vue CLI and Nuxt.js, while React has Create React App and Next.js.

Nuxt.js is a free and open-source JavaScript framework based on Vue.js that helps you develop modern web applications using SSR (server-side rendering) which provides a faster load, better SEO (search engine optimization), and better caching capabilities.

We made a LiveChat Next.js App template. Using Next.js as a foundation for the project, we have a front-end app with built-in routing, Server Side Rendering (SSR), and Server Side Generation (SSG) built with React, but on top of that, ready-to-use API routes built in the form of Serverless functions. If you prefer Vue.js or Svelte, you can choose similar frameworks, like Nuxt.js and SvelteKit.

Not oc, but maybe give Nuxt a look?

Vue's docs are some of the best I've ever read. Nuxt and Craft are pretty great too. I especially like how Craft's docs are bifurcated into the docs which give you the 20/80 + code snippets, and the class reference, which is complete documentation of every method, type, param, etc of the platform.

Nuxt - the Vue alternative to NextJS - supports both static site generation and SSR.