ScalaTest VS Ammonite-Ops

Compare ScalaTest vs Ammonite-Ops and see what are their differences.

ScalaTest

A testing tool for Scala and Java developers (by scalatest)

Ammonite-Ops

Scala Scripting (by lihaoyi)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
ScalaTest Ammonite-Ops
2 15
1,138 2,578
1.1% 0.1%
9.0 8.6
about 24 hours ago 4 days ago
Scala Scala
Apache License 2.0 MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

ScalaTest

Posts with mentions or reviews of ScalaTest. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-06-29.
  • Is Scala worth learning in 2023?
    5 projects | /r/scala | 29 Jun 2023
    Can you execute ScalaTest in IntelliJ like you can with TypeScript tests? Nope! this issue & this and many other like these in other repos have been open for years.

Ammonite-Ops

Posts with mentions or reviews of Ammonite-Ops. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-09-13.
  • Scala Isn't Fun Anymore
    9 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 13 Sep 2022
    That's funny, because this is what I really like about Scala; how quick and easy it is to get a project started.

    > sbt new scala/scala3.g8

    will just create an empty project. If you don't even want to bother with a project, use use scala-cli or ammonite (http://ammonite.io/) to just start banging out code.

    Even the upgrading of a project from Scala2 to Scala3 is a breeze, thanks to very good backwards compatibility of new library releases.

  • A Python-compatible statically typed language erg-lang/erg
    27 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 13 Aug 2022
  • Scala 3 Reflection
    5 projects | /r/scala | 1 Feb 2022
    Scripting API is quite limited, so the third option. - reuse the ammonite scripts https://github.com/com-lihaoyi/Ammonite or look how this is implemented (using internal compiler API),
  • Audacity Fork Without Any Sentry Telemetry or Crash Reporting
    9 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 5 Jul 2021
    Here's an example of a smaller project that added telemetry without suffering a fork:

    https://github.com/com-lihaoyi/Ammonite/issues/607

  • Scripting with Java – Improving Approachability
    2 projects | /r/java | 12 May 2021
    Or ammonite - I've ran Gatling performance test from a simple script based on this gist it fetches all the dependencies, compiles and runs the test, producing nice html report..
  • 25 years of OCaml
    3 projects | /r/programming | 10 May 2021
    Scala with the Typelevel ecosystem. Stay on the jVM, but have a much more pleasant and robust experience, including a great REPL.
  • The Scala ecosystem and circular dependencies?
    3 projects | /r/scala | 10 Apr 2021
    If you are installing, and you are learning, I would also recommend ammonite as an easier REPL.
  • IPython as a System Shell
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Apr 2021
    I've been using amm on and off https://ammonite.io/#Ammonite-Shell

    pretty nice if you know scala, still have to use regular shell(s) so I do not forget them

  • A Lisp REPL as my main shell
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Feb 2021
    I've never tested Ammonite, only read the https://ammonite.io/#Ammonite-Shell, so I'm only guessing here.

    From what I understand, Ammonite was designed as a "readline shell" as I wrote in the article. It perpetuates this approach that everything is a command.

    The thesis of my article suggests we do the opposite: I'm suggesting to rethink shells by starting from the interface (here the SLY REPL) and then implement the shell features.

    In particular, it seems that Ammonite does not support back-references and I'm not sure it has an interactive inspector.

    While Ammonite seems to be a definite improvement over the _syntax_ of Bash, etc., I'm not sure it brings much novelty in terms of user interface. But again, I know very little about it so I may have missed some features :)

    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Feb 2021
    I wonder what people think about Ammonite (https://ammonite.io/)?

    It's not Lisp but Scala so may not be the authors language of choice however it can be used as a Shell: https://ammonite.io/#Ammonite-Shell

    I am personally using it and compared to a classical shell like Bash it's really nice for more structured data related tasks (exploring some API, checking some data, creating a bunch of PRs at once, ...).

    It also makes use of Scala's adjustable syntax and functional concepts so you basically get shell piping but in a strongly typed fashion (e.g.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ScalaTest and Ammonite-Ops you can also consider the following projects:

Specs2 - Software Specifications for Scala

ScalaCheck - Property-based testing for Scala

Gatling - Modern Load Testing as Code

cats - Lightweight, modular, and extensible library for functional programming.

ScalaMeter - Microbenchmarking and performance regression testing framework for the JVM platform.

better-files - Simple, safe and intuitive Scala I/O

scalaprops - property based testing library for Scala

ScalaMock - Native Scala mocking framework

Scalaz - Principled Functional Programming in Scala

Shapeless - Generic programming for Scala

calculator - Windows Calculator: A simple yet powerful calculator that ships with Windows