sbt-revolver VS bloop

Another thing to look into is sbt-revolver, this will shorten the turnaround time on whatever machine is running sbt. I remember it being pretty helpful when I was working with scala.js. Good luck!

SBT. It's not because of the pseudo-scala config language, that looks especially alien next to braceless Scala 3 code. Or the weird symbolic operators. The big problem is correctness; in almost every project I've had to use spray-resolver because I've encountered weird bugs because SBT reuses the same dirty JVM. I really thing Drip would help here. I'll keep using SBT because it has the best Scala ecosystem support and great plugins like sbt-crossproject. It would also be great to be able to write build.sbt files in modern, regular Scala.

Here's the links: * bloop: https://scalacenter.github.io/bloop/ * terminal to IDE (iTerm only): https://alexn.org/blog/2021/07/18/iterm-open-file-cmd-click-ide-semantic-history.html * Switching between JetBrains' and standard typechecker in IDEA: Options -> Languages and Frameworks -> Scala -> Editor tab -> Error highlighting

If you look at the Build Tools section of the Metals documentation, you'll see how Metals supports sbt. It is admittedly a bit of a roundabout process: Metals first imports the sbt build definition into a tool called bloop that implements the Build Server Protocol that Metals relies on for metadata, compilation, etc. for the project.

Jorge Vican had finished some work on this in the past, but this feature was abandoned (for now). As u/tgodzik has pointed out, there is not enough interest for this in the community (thanks for replying btw.).

Bloop -- https://github.com/scalacenter/bloop