marker VS rust

Check out this, which aims to implement said stable interface!

Hey, I might be able to give some input how I deal with it in [rust-linting](https://github.com/rust-linting/rust-linting). For some context, the project needs to load several dynamic libraries and provide each of them with an abstract syntax tree. Serializing and deserializing the types for every step would most likely be too expensive. That's why I opted for a Rust <-> Rust FFI. There are two parts of this: 1. The loaded libraries needed to accept data from a driver. For this, I generate functions in the library crates which are marked as `extern "C"` and only use FFI safe types. Passing information to the loaded crates then always calls the generated functions, which intern call access a thread local struct instance in the dynamic crate. It's important that the instance implement a specific trait. For the library creation, it seems like magic. 2. Callbacks. The loaded libraries need to pass information back to the driver. For this, I use a struct with function pointers. These are also marked as `extern "C"` and need to only use FFI safe types. The definition of FFI safe, is a bit difficult. Slices, `str`, `Option<>` and most of the rusts STD types don't have a stable layout to the point, that it can change between compilations with the same compiler. Therefore, it's required that each passed type is `#[repr(C)]`. Options are wrapped in an enum, which has `#[repr(C)]`, slices and strings are dismantled into a data pointer and a length. On the receiving and they're reconstructed again. A small warning. I'm not an expert on FFI interfaces. My implementation would probably have some problems with lifetimes, if I'd use a slightly different memory model. So far, this has worked well (Besides the required boilerplate). The project is currently sadly lacking documentation, as it's still under heavy development. If you want, feel free to lock around the code base. The stable types and most of the interface is inside the `linter_api` crate.

> instead of choosing a certain numbered version of the random library (if I remember correctly) I let cargo download the latest version which had a completely different API.

Yeah, they didn't follow the instructions and got burned. I still think that multiple things went wrong simultaneously for that experience. I wonder if more prevalent uses of `#[doc(alias = "name")]` being leveraged by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120730 (which now that I check only accounts for methods and not functions, I should get on that!) so that when changing APIs around people at least get a slightly better experience.

Almost fixed the compiler: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123325

Rust: A secure, efficient, and modern programming language (omitting ten thousand words). You can simply follow the installation instructions provided on the official website.

Recently did something similar in Rust but for generating SVGs. We've adopted it for snapshot testing of cargo and rustc's output. Don't have a good PR handy for showing Github's rendering of changes in the SVG (text, side-by-side, swiping) but https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121877/files has newly added SVGs.

To see what is supported, see the screenshot in the docs: https://docs.rs/anstyle-svg/latest/anstyle_svg/

We strongly believe in Rust as a powerful language for building production-grade software, especially for systems like ours that run alongside Kubernetes.

The above Assert<{N % 2 == 1}> requires #![feature(generic_const_exprs)] and the nightly toolchain. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76560 for more info.

Another week, another dive into Rust. This time, we're delving into structs. Structs bear resemblance to interfaces in TypeScript, enabling the grouping of intricate data sets within an object, much like TypeScript/JavaScript. Rust also accommodates functions within these structs, offering a semblance of classes, albeit with distinctions. Let's delve into this topic.