rust-cpp
Embed C++ directly inside your rust code! (by mystor)
rust-derive-builder
derive builder implementation for rust structs (by colin-kiegel)
Our great sponsors
rust-cpp | rust-derive-builder | |
---|---|---|
11 | 1 | |
771 | 1,161 | |
- | - | |
4.6 | 7.3 | |
8 months ago | about 1 month ago | |
Rust | Rust | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
rust-cpp
Posts with mentions or reviews of rust-cpp.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-05.
-
Improving Interoperability Between Rust and C++
I am the current passive maintainer of the cpp crate: https://github.com/mystor/rust-cpp
-
Best practices in creating a Rust API for a C++ library? Seeking advice from those who've done it before.
I would like to utilize OMPL's functionality in Rust code, so I want to call into OMPL C++ code somehow in Rust. I've seen two (non-mutually-exclusive) options so far: - rust-cpp, which allows you to write C++ code in Rust within the cpp!() macro. - cxx, which allows you to define both sides of the FFI boundary manually (as opposed to bindgen's automatic generation).
-
Microsoft is rewriting core Windows libraries in Rust
There's also the cpp and cxx crates for doing C++/Rust interop, but they probably aren't appropriate to use in all cases. The C ABI is definitely the safest way to go unless you're really trying to marry Rust and C++ code bases, not just writing library bindings.
-
Zork++ reaches the v0.5.0, ...where the project has been [completely] rewritten in Rust
https://github.com/mystor/rust-cpp <- not a transpiler, but almost as good
-
US NGO Consumer Reports also reporting on C and C++ safety for product development.
Otherwise, C would never have achieved success in MS-DOS when all the stuff it was binding to at the time required blocks of inline assembly. (Crates like rust-cpp do exist, which allow "inline C++" in the same way that C++ allows inline assembly.)
-
Choosing language for a new project
Actually, you can make inline C++ macro in Rust. Similar unholy monstrosities exist for inline python, inline C, inline SQL, inline HTML,...
-
Tired of safe programming? Embed C directly in your Rust code
Here is a more serious project that allows to embed C++ code directly in your Rust code: https://github.com/mystor/rust-cpp
-
Hello, youki! Faster container runtime is written in Rust
Don't underestimate the power of procedural macros: https://github.com/mystor/rust-cpp
- Use a CPP library from Rust
-
Rust with C++?
Alright, thanks for all your ideas! I also found this mystor/rust-cpp, which apparently allows inline c++ as opposed to cxx. Having yet to try out any of these, I like the idea of inline code more. Thought now I feel I need to brush up my skills a bit more to try this stuff out.
rust-derive-builder
Posts with mentions or reviews of rust-derive-builder.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-05-01.
-
I created easy to use telegram bot API client for rust. It's a complete wrapper for telegram bot api
before implementing setters and getters, I tried builders with https://github.com/colin-kiegel/rust-derive-builder . But it requires implementing `Default` trait, which is not possible to do automatically for most structs.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing rust-cpp and rust-derive-builder you can also consider the following projects:
cxx - Safe interop between Rust and C++
derive_more - Some more derive(Trait) options
rust-bitfield - This crate provides macros to generate bitfield-like struct.
rust-ctor - Module initialization/global constructor functions for Rust
born - Remove code duplication from Struct and Enum with functional macros.
JavaCPP - The missing bridge between Java and native C++
rust-bindgen - Automatically generates Rust FFI bindings to C (and some C++) libraries.
bitflags - A macro to generate structures which behave like bitflags
frankenstein - Telegram bot API client for Rust
rust-cpp vs cxx
rust-derive-builder vs derive_more
rust-cpp vs derive_more
rust-derive-builder vs rust-bitfield
rust-cpp vs rust-ctor
rust-derive-builder vs born
rust-cpp vs JavaCPP
rust-derive-builder vs rust-ctor
rust-cpp vs rust-bindgen
rust-derive-builder vs bitflags
rust-cpp vs bitflags
rust-derive-builder vs frankenstein