rust-cpp
c2rust
Our great sponsors
rust-cpp | c2rust | |
---|---|---|
11 | 46 | |
771 | 3,673 | |
- | 2.7% | |
4.6 | 9.5 | |
8 months ago | 5 days ago | |
Rust | Rust | |
Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
rust-cpp
-
Improving Interoperability Between Rust and C++
I am the current passive maintainer of the cpp crate: https://github.com/mystor/rust-cpp
-
Best practices in creating a Rust API for a C++ library? Seeking advice from those who've done it before.
I would like to utilize OMPL's functionality in Rust code, so I want to call into OMPL C++ code somehow in Rust. I've seen two (non-mutually-exclusive) options so far: - rust-cpp, which allows you to write C++ code in Rust within the cpp!() macro. - cxx, which allows you to define both sides of the FFI boundary manually (as opposed to bindgen's automatic generation).
-
Microsoft is rewriting core Windows libraries in Rust
There's also the cpp and cxx crates for doing C++/Rust interop, but they probably aren't appropriate to use in all cases. The C ABI is definitely the safest way to go unless you're really trying to marry Rust and C++ code bases, not just writing library bindings.
-
Zork++ reaches the v0.5.0, ...where the project has been [completely] rewritten in Rust
https://github.com/mystor/rust-cpp <- not a transpiler, but almost as good
-
US NGO Consumer Reports also reporting on C and C++ safety for product development.
Otherwise, C would never have achieved success in MS-DOS when all the stuff it was binding to at the time required blocks of inline assembly. (Crates like rust-cpp do exist, which allow "inline C++" in the same way that C++ allows inline assembly.)
-
Choosing language for a new project
Actually, you can make inline C++ macro in Rust. Similar unholy monstrosities exist for inline python, inline C, inline SQL, inline HTML,...
-
Tired of safe programming? Embed C directly in your Rust code
Here is a more serious project that allows to embed C++ code directly in your Rust code: https://github.com/mystor/rust-cpp
-
Hello, youki! Faster container runtime is written in Rust
Don't underestimate the power of procedural macros: https://github.com/mystor/rust-cpp
- Use a CPP library from Rust
-
Rust with C++?
Alright, thanks for all your ideas! I also found this mystor/rust-cpp, which apparently allows inline c++ as opposed to cxx. Having yet to try out any of these, I like the idea of inline code more. Thought now I feel I need to brush up my skills a bit more to try this stuff out.
c2rust
-
Converting the Kernel to C++
A recent practical example of the former: the fish shell re-wrote incrementally from C++ to Rust, and is almost finished https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/discussions/10123
An example of the latter: c2rust, which is a work in progress but is very impressive https://github.com/immunant/c2rust
It currently translates into unsafe Rust, but the strategy is to separate the "compile C to unsafe Rust" steps and the "compile unsafe Rust to safe Rust" steps. As I see it, as it makes the overall task simpler, allows for more user freedom, and makes the latter potentially useful even for non-transpiled code. https://immunant.com/blog/2023/03/lifting/
-
Best tools to convert code between languages?
But not all transpilers are between languages where at least one of them is designed to be transpiled. For example, c2rust can transpile, as the name suggests, C to (ugly, unsafe) Rust. A while ago there was a Java -> C compiler in GCC (GCJ), but it's pretty out of date now.
-
Translate C code to Rust working with libc
I do not know about your specific issue but you may be interested by https://github.com/immunant/c2rust
-
Rewrite in Rust or Use Rust-bindings
You should also consider using C2Rust (they're even working on C -> safe Rust translation)
-
Emitting Safer Rust with C2Rust
> The date at the bottom of the article is 2022-06-13. Has there been further progress?
The article links to their github repo:
https://github.com/immunant/c2rust
There's commits in the last hour, so at least some signal of life.
-
Writing an OS in Rust to run on RISC-V
This is arguably already the state of things.
Rust might get compiled down through MIR, down through LLVM IR, down to assembly or wasm... which then might be JIT or AOT (re)compiled into other bytecodes... which might perhaps be decompiled back up to C... and C might be retranslated back to horrific unsafe-spamming Rust by the likes of https://c2rust.com/. We've come full circle!
The main issue is that retranslating high level languages into other high level languages isn't something that there's actually a lot of demand for, especially commercially, especially given the N x M translation matrix going on. So a lot of the projects "stabilize" (get abandoned). And automatically translating between the idioms of those languages gets even nastier in terms of matrix bloat.
Well, you've got stuff like MSIL and JVM bytecodes which are higher level, and preserve more type information, and can be compiled to / decompiled from while still preserving more structure, but they still form competing incompatible ecosystems.
-
Will Carbon Replace C++?
That's the wrong direction. What's needed are intelligent converters which convert less-strict languages to more-strict ones.
Non-intelligent converters just make a mess. Here's c2rust.[1]
Classic C++ to modern C++, plus a compiler flag to lock out all the old unsafe stuff, would be an achievement.
[1] https://c2rust.com/
- What would you rewrite in Rust?
-
Red Black Tree in Rust
Well, technically, it's not hard to build such data structures. If you are willing to liberally use raw pointers, UnsafeCell, MaybeUninit and ManuallyDrop, then you can more-or-less write C-equivalent code in unsafe Rust. (there are even transpilers from C to Rust)
-
In Rust We Trust β A Transpiler from Unsafe C to Safer Rust
/uj This transpiles from C to unsafe Rust using an existing tool, then strips the unsafe keyword from the generated function signatures
What are some alternatives?
cxx - Safe interop between Rust and C++
min-sized-rust - π¦ How to minimize Rust binary size π¦
derive_more - Some more derive(Trait) options
subsurface - This is the official upstream of the Subsurface divelog program
rust-ctor - Module initialization/global constructor functions for Rust
librope - UTF-8 rope library for C
JavaCPP - The missing bridge between Java and native C++
checkedc - Checked C is an extension to C that lets programmers write C code that is guaranteed by the compiler to be type-safe. The goal is to let people easily make their existing C code type-safe and eliminate entire classes of errors. Checked C does not address use-after-free errors. This repo has a wiki for Checked C, sample code, the specification, and test code.
rust-derive-builder - derive builder implementation for rust structs
zz - πΊπ ZetZ a zymbolic verifier and tranzpiler to bare metal C [Moved to: https://github.com/zetzit/zz]
rust-bindgen - Automatically generates Rust FFI bindings to C (and some C++) libraries.
rtorrent - rTorrent BitTorrent client