rust-asn1
mrustc
Our great sponsors
rust-asn1 | mrustc | |
---|---|---|
1 | 75 | |
95 | 2,083 | |
- | - | |
8.1 | 9.0 | |
about 24 hours ago | 5 days ago | |
Rust | C++ | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
rust-asn1
-
Weird architectures weren't supported to begin with
> I feel like this really only makes sense if pyca/cryptography had planned on adding the Rust dependency from the very beginning (or from very early on). Is there any indication that was the case?
I am sure this idea surfaced several times in IRC or possibly in the mailing lists. Certainly, the authors have been toying with handling ASN.1 in rust since 2015 [1], which I guess will be the next logical step.
I do agree that this is mostly a political stance. pyca/cryptography is a wrapper sandwiched between a gigantic runtime written in C (CPython/PyPy) and a gigantic library written in C (openssl).
The addition of Rust as dependency enables the inclusion of just 90 lines of Rust [2] where the only part that really couldn't be implemented in pure Python is a line copied from OpenSSL [3] (i.e. it was already available), and which is purely algebraic, therefore not mitigating any real memory issue at all (the reason to use rust in the first place).
The change in this wrapper (pyca/cryptographic) does not move the needle of security in any significant way, and it is really only meant to send the signal that adding Rust in all other Python packages and especially in the runtime itself will now come at no (political) cost.
[1] https://github.com/alex/rust-asn1
[2] https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/blob/main/src/rust/src/...
[3] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/OpenSSL_1_1_1i/inclu...
mrustc
-
Why do lifetimes need to be leaky?
No, you don't. Existential proof: mrustc ignores lifetimes. Just flat out simply ignores. It changes some corner-cases related to HRBT, yet rustc compiled by mrustc works (that's BTW mrustc exist: to bootsrap the rustc compiler).
-
I think C++ is still a desirable coding platform compared to Rust
Incidentally C++ is the only way to bootstrap rust without rust today.
https://github.com/thepowersgang/mrustc
-
Rust – Faster compilation with the parallel front-end in nightly
Well, there is mrustc[0], a Rust compiler that doesn't include a borrow-checker, so it's possible to compile (at least some versions of) Rust without a borrow checker, though it might not result in the most optimized code.
AFAIK there are some optimization like the infamous `noalias` optimization (which took several tries to get turned on[1]) that uses information established during borrow checking.
I'm also not sure what the relation with NLL (non-lexical lifetimes) is, where I would assume you would need at least a primitive borrow-checker to establish some information that the backend might be interested in. Then again, mrustc compiles Rust versions that have NLL features without a borrow-checker, so it's again probably more on the optimization side than being essential.
[0]: https://github.com/thepowersgang/mrustc
[1]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/57259339
- Running the "Reflections on Trusting Trust" Compiler
-
Forty years of GNU and the free software movement
> Maybe another memory safe language, but Rust has severe bootstrapping issues which is a hard sell for distros that care about source to binary transparency.
It is possible to bootstrap rustc from just GCC relatively easily, although it's a little bit time consuming.
You can use mrustc to bootstrap Rust 1.54: https://github.com/thepowersgang/mrustc
And from then you can go through each version all the way to the current 1.72. (Each new Rust version officially needs the previous one to compile.)
-
Building rustc on sparcv9 Solaris
Have you tried this route : https://github.com/thepowersgang/mrustc ?
-
GCC 13 and the state of gccrs
Mrustc supports Rust 1.54.0 today
- Any alternate Rust compilers?
-
Stop Comparing Rust to Old C++
There are three. The official one, mrustc (no borrow checker, but can essentially compile the official rustc) and GCC (can't really compile anything substantial yet). Only rustc is production-ready though.
-
Can I make it so that only the newest version of Rust gets installed?
That probably depends on what you mean by problematic. Having an ever increasing chain of dependencies isn’t the most desirable situation so there has been some work to trim the bootstrap chain. In 2018, when the blogpost I linked above was written, mrustc was used to bootstrap rust 1.19.0; now mrustc can bootstrap rust 1.54.0 so the chain to recent versions is much shorter than if all those intervening versions back through 1.19.0 needed to be built. https://github.com/thepowersgang/mrustc
What are some alternatives?
serde - Serialization framework for Rust
gccrs - GCC Front-End for Rust
json - Strongly typed JSON library for Rust
gccrs - GCC Front-End for Rust
virgil - A fast and lightweight native programming language
llvm-cbe - resurrected LLVM "C Backend", with improvements
json - JSON for Modern C++
rust-ttapi
urllib3 - urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python
miri - An interpreter for Rust's mid-level intermediate representation
gcc-rust - a (WIP) Rust frontend for gcc / a gcc backend for rustc
winlamb - A lightweight modern C++11 library for Win32 API, using lambdas to handle Windows messages.