rusqlite VS litestream

"Rusqlite is an ergonomic wrapper for using SQLite from Rust." - Crates.io

If you're less concerned about the "structure" of your data (e.g., serializing into rust types) and just need tabular data that can be queried (e.g., how much did we bet on X date, who placed a bet on Y team, etc.) I would definitely lean more towards a SQLite database for that kind of work. rusqlite can get you a functional database fairly quickly with a little reading of the documentation (be sure to use the "bundled" feature).

Create a connection per task. WAL is probably a good idea.

Even using SERIALIZED mode, sqlite has multiple APIs which are completely broken if two clients touch the same connection (https://github.com/rusqlite/rusqlite/issues/342#issuecomment...).

Don't bother, just don't share connections between threads and use the regular multi-thread mode (do use that though).

It fails your "ship with a crate" requirement, but when it comes to "csv but too small for a database" it's always worth having a think about SQLite. Of note, the rusqlite crate with the bundled feature will download, compile, and link against sqlite.

You may want to read the Readme of Rusqlite, especially the Optional Features.

As far as I know, the only option for an embedded SQL database is SQLite. The most actively maintained one, for rust, seems to be rusqlite (https://github.com/rusqlite/rusqlite).

Yes, but it's readonly. Also they did not merge loadable extensions support, which I need - https://github.com/rusqlite/rusqlite/pull/910

rusqlite 0.27.0, which looks like it's still the latest version

SQLite is written in C, while workers is based on V8 isolates, so it mainly runs JavaScript. Fortunately, it also supports running WASM through initialising and calling WASM modules via JavaScript. Emscripten can be used to build WASM from C, but I'd rather use it through Rust (using rusqlite), so this is what I focus on right away. Workers can also be written entirely in Rust using worker-rs.

I have not, but I keep meaning to collate everything I've learned into a set of useful defaults just to remind myself what settings I should be enabling and why.

Regarding Litestream, I learned pretty much all I know from their documentation: https://litestream.io/

This presentation is focused on the use-case of vertically scaling a single server and driving everything through that app server, which is running SQLite embedded within your application process.

This is the sweet-spot for SQLite applications, but there have been explorations and advances to running SQLite across a network of app servers. LiteFS (https://fly.io/docs/litefs/), the sibling to Litestream for backups (https://litestream.io), is aimed at precisely this use-case. Similarly, Turso (https://turso.tech) is a new-ish managed database company for running SQLite in a more traditional client-server distribution.

This post intends to help you setup replication for SQLite using Litestream.

I've been messing around with litestream. It is so cool. And, I either found a bug in the -timestamp switch or don't understand it correctly.

What I want to do is time travel into my sqlite database. I'm trying to do some forensics on why my web service returned the wrong data during a production event. Unfortunately, after the event, someone deleted records from the database and I'm unsure what the data looked like and am having trouble recreating the production issue.

Litestream has this great switch: -timestamp. If you use it (AFAICT) you can time travel into your database and go back to the database state at that moment. However, it does not seem to work as I expect it to:

https://github.com/benbjohnson/litestream/issues/564

I have the entirety of the sqlite database from the production event as well. Is there a way I could cycle through the WAL files and restore the database to the point in time before the records I need were deleted?

Will someone take sqlite and compile it into the browser using WASM so I can drag a sqlite database and WAL files into it and then using a timeline slider see all the states of the database over time? :)

We're using SQLite in production very heavily with millions of databases and fairly high operations throughput.

But we did run into some scariness around trying to use Litestream that put me off it for the time being. Litestream is really cool but it is also very much a cool hack and the risk of database corruption issues feels very real.

The scariness I ran into was related to this issue https://github.com/benbjohnson/litestream/issues/510

Litestream is a library that allows you to easily create backups. You can probably just do analytic queries on the backup data and reduce load on your server.

https://litestream.io/

One possible strategy is to have one directory/file per customer which is one SQLite file. But then as the user logs in, you have to look up first what database they should be connected to.

OR somehow derive it from the user ID/username. Keeping all the customer databases in a single directory/disk and then constantly "lite streaming" to S3.

Because each user is isolated, they'll be writing to their own database. But migrations would be a pain. They will have to be rolled out to each database separately.

One upside is, you can give users the ability to take their data with them, any time. It is just a single file.

[0]. https://litestream.io/

Upstream Kuma uses a local SQLite database to store account data, configuration for services to monitor, notification settings, and more. To make sure that our data is available across redeploys, we will bundle Uptime Kuma with Litestream, a project that implements streaming replication for SQLite databases to a remote object storage provider. Effectively, this allows us to treat the local SQLite database as if it were securely stored in a remote database.