rtic VS cortex-m

Fuchsia has a crap load of wild ideas. Microkernel, capabilities, weird app installation system (I think they're trying to make apps more like websites).

https://rtic.rs/ is a pretty cool idea for an embedded RTOS (sort of).

Honestly though there's still stuff in Plan 9 that is way more advanced than what Linux does, e.g. https://9p.io/sys/doc/lexnames.html

There's also RTIC which is another framework that makes concurrency trivial.

Github here: https://github.com/rtic-rs/rtic

At Telecom Paris, one of the top engineering schools in France, we teach Rust to undergraduate and graduate students who specialize in Embedded Systems. They get to use Rust and RTIC on STM32 based boards, and they also use Embassy for some projects.

If you want something more cutting edge. Try embedded Rust and checkout RTIC. I don't know if it's the real next thing. But i guess it could be fun to try.

RTIC is still going strong, they are working on a 2.0 release at the moment :). There's also now embassy which provides an async runtime (and a ton of other nice things) for embedded as well :)

RTIC - RTOS and task scheduling

That's completely incorrect. The existing ecosystem focuses on web/IO because that's were Async/Await is already being used in other languages so everyone started there. There is significant interest in writing frameworks using async rust in embedded, but the required compiler features for it are still not stable. Check out embassy. Even RTIC has experiments with async.

But neither of them might be usable in you case. Since it looks like you're running bare-metal, a framework like RTIC can give you a initialization function and then pass "static" data to a struct that is shared between all tasks.

I do not have as strong of feelings as your parent, but:

1. A lot of the APIs make use of the typestate pattern, which is nice, but also very verbose, and might turn many people off.

2. The generated API documentation for the lower level crates relies on you knowing the feel for how it generates the various APIs. It can take some time to get used to, especially if you're used to the better documentation of the broader ecosystem.

3. A bunch of the ecosystem crates assume the "I am running one program in ring0" kind of thing, and not "I have an RTOS" sort of case. See the discussion in https://github.com/rust-embedded/cortex-m/issues/233 for example.

For cortex-m support, check out the cortex-m crate

See https://github.com/rust-embedded/cortex-m/tree/master/panic-semihosting

I don't think so. Once a function is compiled, it basically becomes a black box with a type signature so unless sleeping in a function affects its signature, that information is erased. If you pass in some kind of a sleep token that has to be used to sleep, then yeah I think you could enforce it by only being able to get that token in a non-atomic context and making it leak proof.

The Cortex-M crate does something similar, but for proving that you are in an atomic context. Another function that expects a CriticalSection type is then assured that it's running without interrupts enabled.

https://github.com/rust-embedded/cortex-m/blob/master/src/in...